清末民初上海城濠公地案研究

发布时间：2018-07-02 08:12

本文选题：城濠公地 + 管理权　；参考：《华东师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文主要利用晚清民国时期的地方志书、报刊杂志等资料,以1905一1916年间的城濠公地处理问题为研究对象,力图较为完整地呈现这一问题的来龙去脉,探究不同时期、不同背景下,因城濠公地而引起的管理权争端以及填濠筑路之后城濠余地的处置等问题,同时兼及涉入其中的自治机构、提右营、城根租户、城濠官产丈放局等不同势力和利益主体之间的利益纷争。城濠公地问题凸显于晚清地方自治兴起之时。总工程局认为,应将城濠公地纳入地方自治的管辖范围,并提出了全面整改城濠公地的计划。实际拥有城濠公地管理权的提右营并不希望改变这一状况。城根租户出于自身利益的考虑,亦支持提右营继续管理公地。争议因此而起,延至清亡尚未达成一致,自治机构并未达到接收城濠公地管理权的目的。上海光复后,主导自治的地方精英掌握了政权,趁机接管城濠公地,相继推行拆城、填濠、设沟、筑路的工程,并公布城濠余地丈放召变方案。为了尽量保全自身利益,城根租户与城根保产公会在筑路、余地处置、房屋拆让补偿等问题上提出了自己的利益诉求,并略有所获。“二次革命”之后,地方自治停办,城濠余地丈放工作以及未完成的路工建设转由城濠官产丈放局负责。城濠官产丈放局强调城濠公地系“官产”坚持在余地丈放时新旧租户一体对待,拒绝给予旧租户以任何优待。1916年初,在迭经波折和困难之后,南北半城的城濠丈放工作全部完竣,城濠官产丈放局奉令撤销。城濠公地处置一案终告完结。城濠公地处置一案历时十年之久。其间,各方之间的利益纷争、观念分歧和权力冲突,给城濠公地的处置带来了诸多复杂的变数。前期各方之间因公地的归属和管理问题引发激烈的论争,固不待言；即便是城墙拆除之后,由于主事机构的变动、前后政策不一,填濠筑路、余地丈放等具体事务的处理亦反反复复,一波三折。种种争论、反复和波折的发生,既显现了利益纠葛和权力博弈的复杂性和不确定性,也折射出政治局势的变化对地方公共事务的巨大影响。
[Abstract]:This article mainly uses the local chronicles, newspapers and magazines of the period of the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China as the research object to deal with the problems in the city of Haogong from 1905 to 1916, and tries to present the origin of the problem more completely and to explore the different periods. In different backgrounds, the disputes over management rights arising from the land in the city of Gilbert and the disposal of leeway for the city after the construction of the road, as well as the autonomous organizations involved in it, raised the right camp and the tenants of the city root. City government officials and other different forces and interests between the main interests dispute. The problem of city and common land was highlighted in the rise of local autonomy in the late Qing Dynasty. The General Engineering Bureau thinks that the city public land should be brought into the jurisdiction of local autonomy, and puts forward the plan of comprehensive rectification. The right camp, which actually owns the land administration, does not want to change this situation. City root tenants in their own interests also support the right camp to continue to manage the common land. As a result, no agreement has been reached until the end of the Qing Dynasty, and the Home Rule did not achieve the purpose of taking over the administration of the city. After the restoration of Shanghai, the leading local elites took power and took the opportunity to take over the city. They carried out the demolition of the city, the filling of the city, the setting up of ditches, and the construction of roads. In order to preserve their own interests as far as possible, the city root tenants and the city root protection property association put forward their own interest demands on the issues of road construction, leeway disposal, house demotion compensation and so on, and gained a little bit. After the "second Revolution", local autonomy was suspended, and the city's leeway and unfinished road construction were transferred to the city's government office. The City Gilbert Government property Department stressed that the city's public property was "official property" and insisted that new and old tenants should be treated as one when there was room, refusing to give any preferential treatment to old tenants at the beginning of 1916, after repeated setbacks and difficulties. The north and south half of the city Haozhang work is completed, the city government office was revoked by order. The case of the disposal of the land in the city of Gilbert was finally concluded. The disposal of the city's public land lasted for ten years. During this period, the conflicts of interests, ideas and power brought a lot of complicated variables to the disposal of the city's common land. Even after the demolition of the city walls, because of the changes in the principal organs, there were different policies and policies, so they filled out roads and built roads, even after the demolition of the city walls, because of the fierce controversy between the parties over the ownership and management of the communal land. Leeway, and so on the handling of specific matters over and over again, a series of twists and turns. All kinds of arguments, repeated and twists and turns not only reveal the complexity and uncertainty of interest disputes and power game, but also reflect the great influence of the change of political situation on local public affairs.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：K25

【相似文献】