两汉谶纬考论

发布时间：2018-03-03 13:23

  本文选题：汉代　切入点：谶纬　出处：《文史哲》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："谶"与"纬"的思想观念,在两汉时期有一个由分立而化合的过程。古今学人往往笼统讲说汉代"谶纬",并不符合实际。谶验观念始自远古,至汉末一直存续,从未间断。谶至汉初,伴随着经学兴起而发生了新变——以谶辅经、以谶释经。此一现象肇始于文帝时,至汉末一直存在。东汉明、章之后,以白虎观经学讨论会所形成的《白虎通》为标志,确立经、谶互释为正统思想。而其远源,实在汉初。考察谶、纬之发生演变史,实际上有谶而无纬。东汉后期出现的所谓"纬",实际就是谶,其实质是以谶"纬"经。历来通行的"谶纬始自哀、平之际"的论断,不仅曲解了张衡,也淆乱了"谶"、"纬"的概念,更与西汉思想发展实际不符。
[Abstract]:The idea of "prophecy" and "Wei" had a process of combining by separation during the Han Dynasty. The scholars often said in general terms that the "prophecy" of the Han Dynasty was not in line with reality. The idea of prophecy was from ancient times to the end of Han Dynasty. Never stopped. With the rise of Confucian classics, a new change took place along with the rise of Confucian classics. This phenomenon began at the time of Emperor Wen and existed until the end of Han Dynasty. After the Eastern Han Dynasty and Ming Dynasty, Zhang, Taking the "White Tiger Communication" formed by the White Tiger View Classics Seminar as the symbol, establishing the classics and interpreting the prophecy mutually as the orthodox thought. And its far source, in the early Han Dynasty, was to investigate the history of the occurrence and evolution of the prophecies and the latitudes. In fact, there is a prophecy but no weft. The so-called "weft" that appeared in the late Eastern Han Dynasty is actually a prophecy. The essence of the prophecy is not only the misinterpretation of Zhang Heng, but also the conclusion that the prophecy "prophecy", which has always been in use, began to mourn and level. Confusion also confused "prophecy", "weft" concept, but also with the Western Han thought development reality.
【作者单位】： 南开大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“东汉文学思想史”(14BZW026)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K234
，

本文编号：1561210