两汉诏令中的皇帝身份——从“奉宗庙”到“承大业”

发布时间：2018-06-08 07:25

本文选题：两汉 + 诏令　；参考：《史学月刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：在西汉的诏令文本中,皇帝多以"奉宗庙"的身份呈现。从宣帝时期开始,诏令文本中出现了另一种皇帝身份——"承大业",它在东汉的诏令文本中完全取代"奉宗庙"而成为唯一较为固定的皇帝身份。两汉诏令文本中皇帝身份由"奉宗庙"到"承大业"的转变,与"汉家尧后"说和绍述古圣先王功业的理论建构有着直接关联。"承大业"身份不仅可以涵括血脉延续所赋予的合法性,同时也彰显了绍述古圣先王功业所带来的正统性。两汉皇帝身份的转变为皇帝制度注入了新的儒家政治文化内涵,同时也带来了新的权力规训。
[Abstract]:In the texts of the imperial edict of the Western Han Dynasty, the emperor mostly presented himself as "Fu Zongmiao". From the Xuandi period, there appeared another kind of emperor identity in the text of imperial edict, which completely replaced "Bongzongmiao" and became the only relatively fixed emperor in the Eastern Han Dynasty. The transformation of emperor's status from "Bong Zongmiao" to "Chengda cause" in the text of imperial edict of Han Dynasty is directly related to the theory construction of "Han Jiayao Queen" and the theory of describing the ancient sacred ancestors' achievements. " The identity of Dae ye not only includes the legitimacy given by the continuation of blood, but also demonstrates the orthodoxy brought about by the history of the ancient sacred king. The transformation of emperor status in Han Dynasty injected new Confucian political and cultural connotation into emperor system, and also brought new power discipline.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学历史系;
【分类号】：K234.1

【参考文献】