地权、阶级与市

发布时间：2018-06-17 03:19

本文选题：“一田二主” + 永佃　；参考：《学术论坛》2017年05期

【摘要】："一田二主"是明清时期盛行于我国的一种土地制度,其形态之独特使很多分析框架都难以适用,因此长期以来吸引着研究者的关注。文章对有关"一田二主"的研究进行评述,认为出于对传统社会基本结构判断的不同,存在"马派"和"市场派"两种理论视角,前者将"一田二主"视为阶级关系在生产资料所有制上的投射,后者则将其视为市场上平等交易主体间的不同合约类型。通过对田面-田底关系、押租制这两个核心争论点的分析,文章展示了两种视角各自的逻辑和特点,最后进行总结并提出未来的推进方向:走出"阶级-市场"二分的研究思路,在具体历史中探究维系"一田二主"的社会性因素。
[Abstract]:"one farmland and two masters" is a kind of land system prevailing in China in Ming and Qing dynasties. Its unique form makes many analytical frameworks difficult to apply, so it has attracted the attention of researchers for a long time. This paper reviews the research on "one farmland and two masters", and points out that there are two theoretical perspectives of "horse school" and "market school" because of the difference in the judgment of the basic structure of traditional society. The former regards "one farmland and two owners" as the projection of class relations in the ownership of means of production, while the latter regards them as different types of contracts between equal trading subjects in the market. Through the analysis of the relationship between farmland surface and farmland bottom, and the analysis of the two core issues, the paper shows the logic and characteristics of the two perspectives. Finally, the author sums up and puts forward the future direction: go out of the "class-market" research ideas, and explore the social factors that maintain "one field and two masters" in the specific history.
【作者单位】：北京大学社会学系;
【分类号】：K248

【相似文献】