《晋书》的编纂及其文献成就

发布时间：2018-06-21 09:19

本文选题：《晋书》 + 编纂过程　；参考：《安徽大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《晋书》有一百三十卷,题名唐太宗御撰,实为房玄龄、褚遂良、许敬宗为监修,集合众多史臣智慧而编成的官修纪传体正史。该书较为全面地记载了两晋的历史,是研究晋代的基本史料。《晋书》始撰于贞观二十年(646年)闰三月,于贞观二十二年九月修成,历时两年半。原题为《新晋书》,后因藏荣绪《晋书》失传,而去“新”之名。《晋书》开创了官修集体编撰正史之先河,在史书编纂和文献保存上有着巨大贡献。它继承了前代正史的编纂经验,首次把“载记”引入正史,丰富史书记载范围,保存了大量珍贵的文献资料。它还在历史编纂思想、编纂内容以及书法体例等方面有所突破,极大地影响了其后的正史编纂。因此,整理和研究其书的编纂及其文献成就,在推动《晋书》研究和二十五史研究中均有重要意义和学术价值。本文参阅了有关《晋书》的史料,认真研读了中华本《晋书》,在此基础上仔细分析和比较了前人的研究成果,运用历史学和文献学及相关学科理论和方法,对《晋书》的编纂、史料来源、文献价值等方面,进行总结和论述。具体分为四部分来论述。绪论部分主要是关于《晋书》的流传和研究史回顾,阐明有必要对相关问题作进一步研究；第一章《晋书》的编纂,探讨三方面问题：其一,唐初重修《晋书》的缘由；其二,考察《晋书》编纂人员；其三,《晋书》成书时间问题。这些问题历来受到学界的重视,争论也是最激烈的。本章旨在总结前人的研究成果的基础上,试图在充分占有材料的基础上,提出自己对这些问题的看法。第二章探讨《晋书》所凭借的材料,实际上是探索唐修《晋书》的史源问题,主要分为两个方面来阐明,其一,参考相关典籍的记载,考察两晋流传到唐初的相关史料留存；其二,唐初史臣具体参引的两晋史料辨证。第三章评述《晋书》的文献学价值,兼谈有关体例、书法等问题,由于该书是在已有的诸家晋史的基础上,又是继唐代修撰五代史之后,因此通过研究该书可以管窥晋代以降,直至唐初的史学发展状况。这一部分是本论文的主体部分,主要分三方面来讨论的,其一,《晋书》在编纂思想、编纂内容和形式上成就突出；其二,具体分析了《晋书》史论价值；其三,探讨《晋书》的史料价值。通过论述,得出以下认识：其一,《晋书》编成之后,即受到时人的褒奖,它的文献价值和皇家编修的正史地位,使得诸家晋史逐渐退出历史舞台：其二,尽管囿于刘知几对《晋书》的极力贬低,自唐以降还是有众多的学者专家承认其不可或缺的历史地位,从而进行不断的研究,研究的成果也极为丰瞻；其三,关于《晋书》重新编修的缘由,落脚点还是唐初留存的诸家晋史自身的不足和缺陷,当然唐太宗的个人因素的影响也是比较突出的；其四,关于《晋书》修纂的时间和成书时间,尽管诸家各有其说,但是根据目前可信的传世文献的记载分析,贞观二十年闰三月,即《修晋书诏》的颁布时间,应该就是开始着手撰写的时间,而修成时间是贞观二十二年九月,编修历时两年半。参加编修人员总计二十三人,除了太宗撰写四篇史论外,其它诸人都有具体分工,权责明确。其五,关于《晋书》史源问题,目前研究还是十分薄弱。其中主要的问题存在于两方面的制约：一方面两晋文献散佚严重,一方面唐修时进行了大量的删节和改撰。其六,关于《晋书》文献价值的总结,目前相关的研究成果很少,但《晋书》体现了唐初史学所特有的时代气息,不仅继承前代史学的优良传统,还用于开创新的史书义例,其编纂制度和经验被后世模仿,其史论价值、史料价值均有较高的成就。
[Abstract]:"Jin Shu" has one hundred and thirty volumes, which is named Tang Taizong's Royal writing, which is actually Fang Xu's age, Zhu Suiliang, Xu Jingzong as a supervisor and a collection of the official history of the official revision of a large number of historians. The book has recorded the history of the Jin Dynasty in an all-round way and is the basic historical material for the study of Jin Dynasty. "Jin Shu" was written in the twenty year of Zhen Guan (646 years) in the March, and twenty-two in Zhenguan. In September, it lasted for two and a half years. The original title was "new Jin Shu". After it was lost from Tibetan Rong Xu and Jin Shu, it went to the name of "new".
"Jin Shu" pioneered the history of the compilation and compilation of the official repair group. It has made great contributions to the compilation of history books and literature preservation. It inherited the compilation experience of the former history, introduced the "record" into the history for the first time, enriched the scope of the historical records and preserved a large number of valuable documents. It also has the historical compilation thought, the compilation content and the style of calligraphy. As a breakthrough, greatly influenced the subsequent compilation of official history. Therefore, the collation and compilation of the book and its literature achievement in promoting research and to have a < > research significance and academic value.
In this paper, we read the historical materials about Jin Shu and carefully studied the Chinese book of Jin Shu. On this basis, we carefully analyzed and compared the achievements of previous studies, and made a summary and Discussion on the compilation of Jin Shu, the source of historical materials and the value of literature by using history and literature and related theories and methods. It is divided into four parts. The introduction is mainly about the review of the history of the spread and study of Jin Shu, clarifying that it is necessary to make further research on the related issues; the first chapter, the compilation of Jin Shu, discusses three aspects: first, the reason for the revision of "Jin Shu" in the early Tang Dynasty; secondly, the study of "Jin Shu > compiling personnel"; and third, the question of the time of the book of Jin Dynasty. This chapter, on the basis of summarizing the achievements of the predecessors, tries to put forward his views on these issues on the basis of the achievements of the predecessors and on the basis of full possession of the material. The second chapter discusses the materials used by Jin Shu, which is in fact the exploration of the source of the history of the Jin Shu, which is mainly divided into two aspects. First, referring to the records of relevant classics, this paper examines the related historical records of the two Jin Dynasties to the beginning of the Tang Dynasty, and secondly, the historical data of the two Jin Dynasties in the early Tang Dynasty. The third chapter commented on the literature value of Jin Shu, and also related to the problems of style and calligraphy. The book is on the basis of the history of the Jin Dynasty and the five generation history of the Tang Dynasty. Then, through the study of the book, we can see the historical development of the Jin Dynasty to the beginning of the Tang Dynasty. This part is the main part of this paper, which is mainly divided into three aspects. First, Jin Shu has outstanding achievements in the compilation thought, compiling content and form; secondly, it analyzes the historical value of Jin Shu, and the third, discussing Jin Shu. Historical value.
Through the discussion, we get the following understanding: first, after the compilation of "Jin Shu", it is praised by the people, its literature value and the historical status of the Royal editing, making the history of the Jin Dynasty withdraw from the historical stage: secondly, many scholars and experts admit it is indispensible in spite of Liu Zhiji's extreme demeaning to the Shanxi book. The historical position has been carried out continuously and the achievements of the research are also very promising; thirdly, the reasons for the recompilation of the Jin Shu, the foothold or the shortcomings and defects of the history of the Jin Dynasty in the early Tang Dynasty, of course, are of course the influence of Tang Taizong's personal factors; fourth, about the time and the book time of the compilation of Jin Shu. Although all the families have their own words, but according to the analysis of the current creditable documents of the world, the twenty years of Zhenguan's March, namely, the time for the promulgation of the Jin Jin Shu imperial edict, should be the time to begin writing, and the time for the revision is the twenty-two year of Zhen Guan and the two and a half years of the revision of the calendar. In addition to the four historical theories, all the other people have specific division of labor and clear power and responsibility. 5. At present, the research is still very weak about the issue of "Jin Shu > History". The main problems exist in two aspects: on the one hand, the literature of the Jin Dynasty has been lost seriously, and on the one hand, the Tang Dynasty has carried out a large amount of abridged and revised writing. Six, about the value of Jin Shu, is of the value of literature. At present, the related research results are very few, but Jin Shu embodies the peculiar flavor of the history in the early Tang Dynasty. It not only inherits the fine tradition of the historiography of the former generation, but also uses the historical records of innovation. Its compilation system and experience are imitated by the later generations, and their historical values and historical value values have high achievements.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K237

【引证文献】