当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 中国通史论文 >

《清儒学案》研究

发布时间:2018-07-09 13:18

  本文选题:清代 + 《清儒学案》 ; 参考:《福建师范大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:《清儒学案》是一部具有较高价值的学案体著作,但学术界对它的研究还不够全面,尚没有一篇专门系统地研究该著作的论文,甚至以《清儒学案》为研究对象的论文也是甚少,这很大程度地影响了其学术价值的发挥。 《清儒学案》成书于民国年间,由于其原刻板尚存,所以其版本主要是以民国刻本为基础的影印本和近年来各出版社出版的点校本,该书成于众手,记载了清一代的学术渊源,涉及经学、理学、史学、先秦诸子、天文历算、文字音韵、方舆地志、诗文金石等各个方面,因此该书的内容涉及面极广。对于清代学术,也大都囊括其中,书中收录的学人著述及编者对其的评述,可与一些清代学术著作形成互补;此外《清儒学案》也有极高的史料价值和学术史价值,总而言之该书具有丰富的文献价值。 《清儒学案》也有不足之处,如体例不够完善,内容太过庞杂和记载存在错误等缺陷。此外,笔者对使用文献时发现了中华书局点校本的一些问题,并对此进行了分析,提出自己的看法。
[Abstract]:"the case of Confucianism in Qing Dynasty" is a highly valuable academic case book, but the academic research on it is not comprehensive enough, and there is not a paper devoted to the systematic study of this work. Even the "Qing Confucianism case" as the object of study is very few, which to a large extent affects the exertion of its academic value. The "Qing Confucianism case" was written in the Republic of China, because of its original stereotype still exists. Therefore, its version is mainly a photocopy based on the inscriptions of the Republic of China and a school edition published by various publishing houses in recent years. The book, which is a popular book, records the academic origins of the Qing Dynasty, covering the studies of classics, Confucianism, history, pre-Qin schools of thought, and astronomical calculations. Phonetics, Fang Yu Zhi, Shi Wen Jin Shi and other aspects, so the book covers a wide range of content. Most of the academic works in the Qing Dynasty are also included in it. The scholarly writings and the comments made by the editors in the books can complement some academic works of the Qing Dynasty. In addition, the case of Confucianism in the Qing Dynasty also has a very high historical and academic historical value. In a word, the book has abundant literature value. "the case of Confucianism in Qing Dynasty" also has some shortcomings, such as imperfect style, too complex content and errors in recording, etc. In addition, the author finds some problems in the use of the literature, analyzes the problems and puts forward his own views.
【学位授予单位】:福建师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:K249

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘凤强;;《清儒学案》选录资料原则探析[J];兰台世界;2011年16期

2 陈祖武;钱宾四先生与《清儒学案》[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期

3 官大梁;《明史》正误二则[J];史学月刊;1986年06期

4 谢忠明;《资治通鉴》辨误一则[J];史学月刊;1987年03期

5 贾二强;《北史》勘误一则[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1990年01期

6 于学义;《旧五代史》、《资治通鉴》证误各一则[J];史学月刊;1991年02期

7 王青霞;《敕勒歌》应是民歌[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版);1992年03期

8 王友敏;;《资治通鉴》标点纠谬[J];史学月刊;1997年01期

9 方原;;《史记》刊误一则[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期

10 张文冠;;《宋史》“勾索”勘误[J];中国典籍与文化;2011年03期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 杝,

本文编号:2109488


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2109488.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户367a0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com