章太炎在台湾与明治日本思想的初遇——兼论戊戌后康有为、章太炎政治主张之异同

发布时间：2018-03-09 05:26

本文选题：章太炎　切入点：明治国体论　出处：《近代史研究》2013年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：章太炎与明治日本思想初次相遇,是在1898年末至1899年6月的台湾。此时期,中日两国各自的政治及彼此文化交流均处于重要的历史拐点。章太炎供职于殖民当局的官办媒体《台湾日日新报》,在该报上发表了一系列文章,悼念维新六贤,声援康、梁,思索和规划中国政治蓝图。这既是戊戌政变的余波,又拉开了清末十年以康章为代表的不同派别进行伦理及政治思想对话的序幕。而日本多年来期冀与中国"夷夏"易位,此时在其首块殖民地台湾获得了实践空间。通过宣传吸附儒学忠孝伦理的"国体论",鼓吹天皇"万世一系",日本强力管控着台湾的意识形态。章太炎与日本学人就评价康有为的言行往复论辩,立场尖锐对立;章氏倡导以孔子后裔为中华共主,自认为是借鉴天皇万世一系,却为日人坚决抵制。他们的冲突是东亚儒学花开两朵后的一场遭遇战,其核心在于是否承认革命具有政教伦理的合法性,以及"忠"究竟是相互的还是单向的道德义务。明治国体论又可谓康、章清末政治分歧的第三方参照物。与之比照,可知康章之政治主张实际上"同"大于"异",二人均未逾越儒学"一统"与"革命"的两项价值,共同撑起了中国近代政治转型的空间。
[Abstract]:Zhang Taiyan and Meiji Japanese thought met for the first time, from end of 1898 to June 1899 in Taiwan. The political and cultural exchanges between China and Japan are at an important historical inflection point. Zhang Taiyan served in the official media of the colonial authorities, the Taiwan Daily News, and published a series of articles in the newspaper to mourn the reform of the six sages and to show solidarity with Kang and Liang. Pondering and planning China's political blueprint. This is not only the afterwave of the Wuxu coup, but also the prelude to the ethical and political dialogue between the different factions represented by Kang Zhang in the late Qing Dynasty. At this time in its first colony of Taiwan to gain practical space. By promoting the Confucian ethics of loyalty and filial piety of the "national theory", advocating the emperor's "eternal family", Japan strongly controlled the ideology of Taiwan. Zhang Taiyan and the Japanese Scholars. Arguing over the comments made on Kang Youwei's words and deeds, Zhang's stand was acutely opposed; Zhang's advocacy of taking the descendants of Confucius as the Communist master of China thought that he was drawing lessons from the Emperor, but firmly resisted by the Japanese. Their conflict was an encounter after East Asian Confucianism blossomed into two flowers. Its core lies in whether or not the revolution has the legitimacy of political and religious ethics, and whether "loyalty" is a mutual or one-way moral obligation. It can be seen that the political proposition of Kang Zhang is actually "same" more than "different", and both of them have not exceeded the two values of Confucianism "unification" and "revolution", which together support the space for political transformation in modern China.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院近代史研究所;湖南师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“中国近代‘国学'构想的建立:章太炎与明治思潮”(12CZS042)的阶段性成果中国社会科学院创新工程项目“抗战建国与民族复兴”的前期成果
【分类号】：D092

【参考文献】