回到亨廷顿的福山——从保守主义到保守的自由主义

发布时间：2018-03-10 19:26

本文选题：亨廷顿　切入点：福山　出处：《学术界》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：第三波民主化非但没有带来"历史的终结",反而因非西方国家的民主转型而导致的民主回潮和普遍的无效治理而终结了"历史终结论"。对时代极为敏感的福山又适时地提出了政治秩序原理,即时序性的强国家—法治—民主问责,是构成良政的基本制度。在我们看来,福山的政治秩序原理其实是回到40年前《变革社会中的政治秩序》的基本观点乃至基本论述,亨廷顿强调时间性在制度变迁中的重要性,并给出了"权威—秩序—发展"的政治方案,这是福山政治秩序原理的直接思想资源。因此,福山的政治秩序原理没有什么思想性贡献。如果说亨廷顿是典型的战略保守主义者,福山的立场则从自由主义演变为保守自由主义。
[Abstract]:The third wave of democratization not only did not bring the "end of history", but also ended the "theory of the end of history" because of the return of democracy caused by the democratic transformation of non-western countries and the general ineffective governance. Fukuyama, who is extremely sensitive to the times, also. The principle of political order was put forward in due course. That is, the time-series strong state, the rule of law and democratic accountability, is the basic system that constitutes good governance. In our view, Fukuyama's principle of political order is actually a return to the basic viewpoint and even the basic exposition of "political order in changing Society" 40 years ago. Huntington emphasizes the importance of timefulness in the process of institutional change, and puts forward the political scheme of "authority-order-development", which is the direct ideological resource of Fukuyama's political order principle. Fushan's principle of political order has no ideological contribution. If Huntington is a typical strategic conservative, Fukuyama's position has evolved from liberalism to conservative liberalism.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学政治学系;
【基金】：中国人民大学“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”支持,项目批准号为16XNLG10
【分类号】：D082;D091

【相似文献】