在联合国人权理事会中的瑞士、欧洲国家和中国

发布时间：2018-04-04 18:25

本文选题：人权　切入点：人权理事会　出处：《比较法研究》2013年01期

【摘要】：本文通过分析联合国人权委员会自其成立以来通过的表决,特别是有关人权内容问题有争议的表决,将瑞士、欧洲国家和中国的表决情况进行比较,着重对瑞士的表决态度进行研究,并结合《反对诋毁宗教决议》之例,得出:瑞士在国别决议和主题决议上并未有官方称赞的重大影响;瑞士官方的人权观点不清且与实际矛盾;在对待《反对诋毁宗教决议》以及相关问题上,瑞士官方和一些人权组织在国内和国际所表达的态度不一致;瑞士官方一方面自喻其在该理事会的身份及其贡献,另一方面却对该理事会通过的,但其投票反对的、能表达大多数国家,特别是发展中国意见的人权决议视而不见。作者最后建议瑞士重新定位人权观念。
[Abstract]:This paper compares the voting situation among Switzerland, European countries and China by analyzing the votes adopted by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights since its establishment, especially those concerning the content of human rights.Focusing on the voting attitude of Switzerland and combining with the example of "Resolution against defamation of religions", it is concluded that Switzerland has no significant impact of official praise on country resolutions and thematic resolutions;(a) the official human rights perspective in Switzerland is unclear and contradictory to practice; the attitude expressed by the Swiss authorities and some human rights organizations at the national and international levels is inconsistent with the Resolution against defamation of religions and related issues;Swiss officials, on the one hand, identify themselves with the Council and its contribution, on the other hand, turn a blind eye to human rights resolutions adopted by the Council, but which it votes against, expressing the views of the majority of States, particularly developing countries.Finally, the author suggests that Switzerland redefine the concept of human rights.
【作者单位】：德国弗莱堡阿尔伯特-路德维希大学;德国马普外国刑法和国际刑法所;弗莱堡阿尔伯特-路德维希大学;
【分类号】：D082

【相似文献】