当奥尔森遇上奥斯特罗姆:集体行动理论的演化与发展

发布时间：2018-04-20 19:28

本文选题：印第安纳学派 + 奥斯特罗姆　；参考：《人文杂志》2013年10期

【摘要】：奥尔森将公共选择理论运用于集体行动领域,构建了集体行动和利益集团研究的经济路径。后来的集体行动理论基本上建立在对奥尔森观点的批评、拥护或者延伸基础上。以奥斯特罗姆等人为代表的印第安纳学派对于奥尔森理论修正的最大特点是将制度分析融入到集体行动研究中。首先,它更新了奥尔森的产品分类标准,更加全面地探究了产品属性与集体行动间的关联;其次,学派将理性选择模型改造为理性选择制度主义,强调制度在改善人类理性活动中的重要作用;再次,奥尔森将集体行动困境的解决办法寄托于精英式的"选择性激励"上,学派的研究则表明,自主治理有望成为另一种可能选择。然而,两种理论也存在明显的呼应与互补。
[Abstract]:Olson applied the theory of public choice to the field of collective action and constructed the economic path of collective action and interest group research. Later theories of collective action were basically based on criticism, support or extension of Olson's views. The greatest characteristic of Indiana School, represented by Ostrom et al., in the revision of Olson's theory is to integrate institutional analysis into the study of collective action. First, it updated Olson's product classification standard, and explored the relationship between product attributes and collective action more comprehensively. Secondly, the school transformed the rational choice model into rational choice institutionalism. Emphasizing the important role of institution in improving human rational activities. Thirdly, Olson places the solution of collective action dilemma on the elitist "selective incentive", while the school of thought studies show that, Autonomous governance is expected to become another possible option. However, there are obvious echoes and complementarities between the two theories.
【作者单位】：南开大学周恩来政府管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目:“利益冲突的整合协调机制研究”(项目号:11CZZ013)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D035

【参考文献】