转型民主问题与现代民主形态多种属性研究——兼析亨廷顿的转型民主观

发布时间：2018-04-24 07:37

本文选题：转型民主 + 西方文化论　；参考：《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年03期

【摘要】：自20世纪70年代"第三波"民主化浪潮以来,西方民主化理论研究的重心逐步向民主转型等议题转移,塞缪尔·亨廷顿在《第三波:20世纪后期的民主化》一书中梳理了近代以来现代民主发展的进程,但是世界民主化已出现新的动向;"西方文化论"将现代民主与资本主义经济政治体制联系在一起,企图垄断民主话语权,对非西方文化带有明显的文化偏见。多元民主理论支持现代民主形态的多元属性,世界民主化进程也展示了现代民主形态的多元属性。金融危机背景下的西方"民主退化"与"民主输出困境"的事实再次证明,西方现代民主形态不具有普世价值意义,后发国家在选择现代民主形态时,必须根据自身特点,选择符合自身发展需要的民主形态。
[Abstract]:Since the third wave of democratization in the 1970s, the focus of theoretical research on democratization in the West has gradually shifted to issues such as democratic transformation. Samuel Huntington, in democratization in the late 20th Century of the third Wave, combs the development of modern democracy since modern times. However, there has been a new trend in the democratization of the world. "Western Culture Theory" links modern democracy with capitalist economic and political system, and attempts to monopolize the right of democratic discourse, which has obvious cultural prejudice against non-western culture. The theory of pluralistic democracy supports the pluralistic attributes of modern democratic forms, and the process of democratization in the world also shows the pluralistic attributes of modern democratic forms. Under the background of the financial crisis, the facts of "democratic degeneration" and "democratic export dilemma" in the West once again prove that the western modern democratic form has no universal value, and that the latter countries must choose the modern democratic form according to their own characteristics. Choose a democratic form that meets the needs of one's own development.
【作者单位】：同济大学政治与国际关系学院;同济大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：D082

【参考文献】