“不能共则不能和”:晚期康有为的国家建构论与政体论

发布时间：2018-04-26 18:12

本文选题：共和制 + 君主立宪制　；参考：《思想战线》2016年06期

【摘要】：康有为在1923年《长安演说集》中提出"不能共则不能和"的命题,其中"共"建立在"公"与"通"的基础之上,指向包括铁路、无线电报、银行在内的一系列现代国家基础设施和基本制度的建设,因而,"不能共则不能和"这一命题,在很大程度上指出了国家能力对于政体运作的基础性意义。但是,"不能共则不能和"作为对"中华民国"初期政治的批判,又隐含了康有为对于君主立宪制的执念。该时期两次重建君主立宪制的尝试归于失败已说明,在政治高度碎片化的背景下,君主立宪制并不具有自然的政治整合作用。但在剔除康有为的政体执念之后,"不能共则不能和"是一个对今日的国家治理仍深具建设性意义的命题,值得今人继承与发展。
[Abstract]:In 1923, Kang Youwei put forward the proposition that "cannot be co-existed but can not be reconciled", in which the Communist is based on "public" and "communication", pointing to the railway and radio telegraphy. The construction of a series of modern national infrastructure and basic system, such as banks, therefore, the proposition that "can not be reconciled together" points out to a great extent the basic significance of state capacity to the operation of polity. However, as a critique of the initial politics of the Republic of China, Kang Youwei's adherence to the constitutional monarchy was implied. The failure of two attempts to rebuild the constitutional monarchy in this period shows that the constitutional monarchy does not play a natural role in political integration under the background of political fragmentation. But after taking out Kang Youwei's system of government, "can not be co-existed but can not be reconciled" is a proposition that is still very constructive to the governance of the country today, and is worthy of inheritance and development.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D092

【相似文献】