世界公民理论及当代价值研究

发布时间：2018-05-01 22:36

本文选题：世界公民理论 + 世界公民社会　；参考：《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文通过对古典政治哲学关于人类特性思考的重新理解,提出世界公民理论的价值、合法性与可行性,分析世界公民理论所带来的对权利、正义等概念,并参考目前的世界性组织,结合中国传统思想与世界主义理念相契合之处,思考中国国民参与全球性事务的要求和途径。第一部分梳理了世界公民理论的产生基础——世界主义理论及其社会根源。在对世界主义的概念性考察中,区分了西方世界主义概念发展的不同阶段,得出世界主义理想在人类历史发展中始终占有一席之地,并在当前全球化趋势下具有重要意义的结论。另外,本文在世界主义理论发展脉络中发现了世界公民理论、世界公民社会、世界政府、世界法律等观念的雏形。关于世界主义实践也作了古代与现代区分,这利于下文中对古代世界公民主义和现代世界公民主义之间区别的理解。第二部分为论文主体与核心。这一部分重点考察了世界公民理论的内容,包括微观意义上的世界公民和宏观意义上的世界公民社会。本文注重阿伦特对古典政治哲学理想的重现,明确了古代语境中的“政治”与现代语境中的“政治”的不同指向。古典政治哲学对于政治的理解是公共和道德取向的,而现代意义上的政治则带有私人和功利取向。西方古代思想家提出的人的政治性是人拥有美好生活的条件。在此意义上,本文批判了当前作为政治事务中重要内容的经济因素对人类政治生活和公共领域的摧毁,从而探讨世界公民及组建世界公民社会对于当下世界的意义与可行性。关于世界公民的实践中,本文区分了关于世界公民的政治实践与价值实践,根据古典政治哲学的理解,将世界公民归述为一种价值实践。第三部分包括文章第三至第五章内容。这部分内容主要分析了世界公民理论所产生的影响和面临的质疑,并针对世界公民理论如何在当前全球化背景下得以实现,提出两方面方案。一为建构世界范围内的社群与公共空间,二为实现世界公民教育。最后,本文通过分析中国古代“天下主义”的儒家思想,来探讨这一源自西方世界的理论对于中国的适用性。
[Abstract]:Through the re-understanding of classical political philosophy about the human characteristics, this paper puts forward the value, legitimacy and feasibility of the theory of world citizenship, and analyzes the concepts of right and justice brought about by the theory of world citizenship. Referring to the current world organizations and combining the traditional Chinese thought with the cosmopolitanism, the author thinks about the requirements and ways for Chinese people to participate in global affairs. The first part combs the foundation of the world citizenship theory-cosmopolitanism theory and its social origin. In the conceptual investigation of cosmopolitanism, the author distinguishes the different stages of the development of the concept of cosmopolitanism in the west, and concludes that cosmopolitanism has always occupied a place in the development of human history. And in the current trend of globalization has an important conclusion. In addition, in the development of cosmopolitanism, this paper finds the rudiments of the concepts of world citizenship theory, world civil society, world government, world law and so on. The practice of cosmopolitanism is also distinguished between ancient and modern, which is beneficial to the understanding of the distinction between ancient world citizenship and modern world citizenship. The second part is the subject and core of the thesis. This part focuses on the content of the theory of world citizenship, including the microscopic sense of the world citizen and the macro sense of the world civil society. This paper focuses on Arendt's reappearance of the ideal of classical political philosophy, and clarifies the different directions of "politics" in the ancient context and "politics" in the modern context. The understanding of politics in classical political philosophy is public and moral, while politics in the modern sense is private and utilitarian. Western ancient thinkers put forward that the political nature of human beings is the conditions for people to have a good life. In this sense, this paper criticizes the destruction of human political life and public sphere by the economic factors, which is an important part of political affairs, and probes into the significance and feasibility of world citizens and the establishment of world civil society for the present world. In the practice of the world citizen, this paper distinguishes the political practice and the value practice about the world citizen, according to the understanding of the classical political philosophy, classifies the world citizen as a kind of value practice. The third part includes the contents of the third to fifth chapters. This part mainly analyzes the impact of the theory of world citizenship and challenges it faces, and puts forward two solutions to how the theory of world citizenship can be realized under the background of current globalization. One is to construct the community and public space in the world, the other is to realize the world civic education. Finally, this paper discusses the applicability of this theory from the western world to China through the analysis of the Confucian thought of "the world doctrine" in ancient China.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D032

【相似文献】