王通的政治道统论

发布时间：2018-05-11 01:23

本文选题：王通 + 政治道统　；参考：《北京行政学院学报》2014年03期

【摘要】：王通思想的一个核心是对政治道统的思考。这种思考可以表述为两个问题:政治道统的内涵为何?政治道统的统序为何?王通论南北朝正统回答了第一个问题。南北朝互争正统,皆认为自身保有政治道统。但南朝虽有前代文物典章,但尽失王道,最终不仅失去了正统,也失去了政治道统之所在;北魏虽然是夷狄政权,但因其践行王道,故最终获得了中国正统,并保有了政治道统之内涵。政治道统之承载不在典章文物,不在夷夏之别,而是王道实践。王通论三代两汉之取舍则回答了第二个问题。王通认为二者虽然有高下之区别,但都是王道政治的展现,都是政治道统的组成环节。政治道统的统序非是孤立的三代,而是三代、两汉以及后代王道实践的集合。
[Abstract]:One of the core of Wang Tong's thought is the thinking of political system. This kind of thinking can be expressed as two questions: what is the connotation of political ethics? What is the order of the political system? The first question was answered by Wang Tong on the orthodoxy of the Southern and Northern dynasties. The Southern and Northern dynasties contended for orthodoxy and thought they had political integrity. However, although the Southern Dynasty had the cultural relic laws of the previous generation, it lost all the ways of the king, and eventually lost not only orthodoxy, but also the political orthodoxy. Although the Northern Wei Dynasty was the regime of Yidi, it eventually gained Chinese orthodoxy because of its practice of the king's way. And retained the connotation of political integrity. The bearing of political morality is not the cultural relic, not the difference of the Yi Xia, but the practice of the king's way. Wang Tong's theory on the trade-off between the three dynasties and the Han Dynasty answered the second question. Wang Tong believes that although there are differences between the two, they are both the manifestation of the politics of the king and the components of the political system. The unified order of political Taoism is not the isolated three generations, but the collection of the three generations, the Han Dynasty and the later generations.
【作者单位】：荷兰莱顿大学LIAS;
【分类号】：D092

【参考文献】