再分配、承认与代表权——弗雷泽正义理论研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 22:16

本文选题：正义 + 再分配　；参考：《南京大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：南茜·弗雷泽是法兰克福学派第三代社会批判理论的代表人物,其三维—元的正义理论——再分配、承认与代表权以及作为根本原则的参与平等——是左翼社会批判理论的最新成果,本文主要从三个问题考察了弗雷泽三维一元的正义理论。这三个问题是：解决什么,如何解决,以及解决得怎样?在全球化的今天,虽然人们还在为争取经济利益而斗争,但是,越来越多的人在谈论各种各样的群体斗争与“新社会运动”,他们通过各种大众媒体与公共渠道来讨论诸如女权运动、同性恋的性行为、族裔与人种等群体所遭受的不正义。以此为标志,西方出现了一种所谓的“为承认而斗争”的正义理论。我们应该怎么去理解这些群体斗争和“新社会运动”?弗雷泽的正义理论给我们提供了一种很好视角和分析模式。首先,本文集中探讨了“后社会主义”的状况,这是弗雷泽所要解决的问题；其次,本文通过梳理弗雷泽提出的再分配——承认难题以及由此引起的西方批判理论界的争论,介绍了弗雷泽解决群体斗争的“肯定的方案”与“改造的方案”,同时,对“承认”这个古老而又十分后现代的概念进行了理论上艰涩的分析,并区分了弗雷泽文化差异的身份承认与成员资格的地位承认,当然,与霍耐特所提出的基于道德心理学的承认秩序不同,弗雷泽始终坚持承认的文化维度。第三,本文探讨了全球正义与代表权问题以及参与平等原则。最后,我对弗雷泽的正义理论的价值与不足进行了评估,其最有价值的地方在于开拓了传统分配正义的文化承认维度,并且很好地将再分配、承认与代表权统一起来,塑造了一种解释各种群体斗争的范式。
[Abstract]:Nancy Fraser is the representative figure of the third generation of critical theory of society in Frankfurt school. Recognition and representation, as well as equality of participation as the fundamental principle, are the latest achievements of the social criticism theory on the left wing. This paper mainly examines Frazier's theory of justice in three dimensions from three aspects. These three problems are: what to solve, how to solve, and how to solve? In the era of globalization, although people are still fighting for economic benefits, more and more people are talking about various group struggles and "new social movements". They discuss through mass media and public channels the injustice suffered by groups such as the feminist movement, homosexual sex, and ethnic groups. As a sign, the West has emerged a so-called "fight for recognition" theory of justice. How should we understand the struggles of these groups and the "new social movements"? Frazier's theory of justice provides us with a good perspective and an analytical model. First of all, this paper focuses on the situation of "post-socialism", which is the problem that Frazier wants to solve. Secondly, by combing Frazier's redistribution-admission problem and the controversy in western critical theory, This paper introduces the "affirmative scheme" and "reform plan" of Frazier's solution to the group struggle. At the same time, it makes a theoretical analysis of the ancient and post-modern concept of "recognition". It also distinguishes between the identity recognition of Fraser cultural differences and the status recognition of membership. Of course, different from the recognition order based on moral psychology proposed by Honet, Frazier always insists on the cultural dimension of recognition. Thirdly, this paper discusses the problem of global justice and representation and the principle of equality of participation. Finally, I evaluate the value and deficiency of Frazier's theory of justice, the most valuable part of which is to develop the dimension of cultural recognition of traditional distributive justice, and to unify redistribution, recognition and representation. Has shaped a kind of explanation each kind of group struggle paradigm.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D09

【相似文献】