新政治人类学:一种跨学科的理解范式

发布时间：2018-05-22 17:28

本文选题：新政治人类学 + 政治学科学化　；参考：《学术月刊》2017年02期

【摘要】：新政治人类学旨在发掘具有范式象征符号的"学科基质"与"有序元素",逐步形成跨学科新型研究范式。新政治人类学正在经历着自觉认同、共同持有某种"学科基质"的探索性过程,研究内容主要体现在"三四"学术框架上,即"学科基质"的"三化"过程(政治学科学化、人类学政治化、民族志写文化),与"有序元素"的"四要素"组合(权力要素、田野要素、民族志要素、扎根理论要素)的辩证统一上。一是坚守文化人类学田野工作中的权力要素——与"人类学政治化"相结合。二是坚守文化人类学中的田野要素——与"政治学科学化"相结合。三是坚守文化人类学中的民族志要素——与"政治学科学化"相结合。四是坚守文化人类学中的"扎根理论"要素——与"民族志写文化"相结合。
[Abstract]:The aim of new political anthropology is to explore the "subject matrix" and "ordered element" with the symbol of paradigm, and to gradually form a new interdisciplinary research paradigm. New political anthropology is experiencing an exploratory process of consciously identifying itself and holding a certain kind of "discipline matrix" together. The research contents are mainly embodied in the academic framework of "the fourth of March", that is, the process of "three turns" of the "subject matrix" (scientization of political science). Anthropology politicization, ethnographic writing culture, and the combination of "four elements" (power factor, field factor, ethnographic element, rooted theoretical element) are dialectical unity. One is to adhere to cultural anthropology in the field of the elements of power-and anthropological politicization. Second, adhere to the cultural anthropology in the field elements-and political science combined. Third, adhere to the ethnographic elements of cultural anthropology-and the combination of political science. Fourth, adhere to the cultural anthropology of the "rooted theory" elements-and the "national history writing culture."
【作者单位】：上海师范大学哲学与法政学院;
【基金】：2011年度教育部人文社科重点研究基地北京大学国家治理研究院重大项目“政治人类学视野下的政治体制改革研究”(11JJD810018)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D0

【参考文献】