社会性与公共性析论——兼论中国社会三层次说及其方法论意义

发布时间：2018-05-23 12:43

本文选题：社会性 + 公共性　；参考：《学习与探索》2013年10期

【摘要】：中国古代政治思想家和统治者是否具有公共性思维及其政策实践?通过比照中国传统社会的社会性与现代公共性的价值内涵、关注问题即国家组织目标,以及操作方式即实现路径三个层面,可以明显看出,在中国传统社会,其可能具有的政治层面的公共性主要地表现为社会性。如果以中国人的社会存在作为进一步分析的视角,亦即从私人领域、社会领域和政治领域三层次划分来解读中国社会,则传统中国的政治领域极度强势,实际覆盖了其他领域。延至当代中国,公共领域依然羸弱,从而导致社会成熟程度很低,社会自组织能力极度欠缺。这一立论和分析方式内涵着中国政治思想与政治文化研究的方法论意义,主要体现在历史感、主观投射过度和学术研究的非唯一功利性等三个方面。
[Abstract]:Do ancient Chinese political thinkers and rulers have public thinking and policy practice? By comparing the value connotation of the sociality and the modern publicity of Chinese traditional society, paying attention to the problem, that is, the goal of the state organization, and the mode of operation, we can clearly see that in the traditional Chinese society, The publicity of its possible political level is mainly reflected in its sociality. If we take the social existence of Chinese as the perspective of further analysis, that is, to interpret Chinese society from the three levels of private domain, social field and political field, then the traditional Chinese political field is extremely strong and actually covers other fields. In contemporary China, the public sphere is still weak, resulting in a very low level of social maturity and an extreme lack of self-organizing capacity. This theory and analytical method implies the methodological significance of the study of Chinese political thought and political culture, which is mainly embodied in three aspects: the sense of history, the excessive subjective projection and the non-sole utilitarianism of academic research.
【作者单位】：山东大学政治学与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国传统政治文化与坚持走中国特色社会主义政治发展道路研究”(13&ZD008)
【分类号】：D092

【共引文献】