西方比较政治学的方法论误区

发布时间：2018-05-25 04:05

本文选题：方法论变革 + 观念类因素　；参考：《国外理论动态》2017年01期

【摘要】：方法论变革受许多因素的影响,其中容易被忽视的往往是那些隐藏在客观条件背后、无时无刻不影响着研究者的精神、价值观、意识形态等观念类因素,尤其是在"观念导向被良好地包装成历史必然"的情景下更是如此。在比较政治学内部,对普遍性的执着代表着对一种既定制度、程序、价值的坚持,它逐渐忽略甚至刻意忘却了政治世界的多元本质。在比较政治学外部,跨学科理论为应对现实难题导致的学科碎片化问题提供了工具,但构建交叉学科一体化的、追求普遍性的方法论背离了比较研究的学科特性与现状;更低层次的学科交流也许更有利于比较政治学的发展。二元化观念能减少社会科学的模糊性和狭隘性,但把握政治世界的多元本质才能防止方法论变革陷入误区。
[Abstract]:The change of methodology is influenced by many factors, among which the ones that are easily ignored are those hidden behind the objective conditions, which affect the spirit, values, ideology and other conceptual factors of the researchers all the time. This is especially true in the scenario of "concept-oriented being well packaged as historical necessity". In comparative politics, the persistence of universality represents the persistence of an established system, procedure, and value, which gradually ignores or even deliberately forgets the pluralistic nature of the political world. In the exterior of comparative politics, interdisciplinary theory provides a tool for dealing with the fragmentation of disciplines caused by practical problems, but the methodology of building interdisciplinary integration and pursuing universality deviates from the characteristics and current situation of comparative studies. Lower levels of academic communication may be more conducive to the development of comparative politics. Dualism can reduce the fuzziness and parochialism of social science, but grasping the pluralistic nature of the political world can prevent the methodology reform from falling into the wrong zone.
【作者单位】：武汉理工大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：D0

【相似文献】