制度与儒家之间——思想史视域中的制度儒家

发布时间：2018-05-30 13:02

本文选题：制度 + 儒家　；参考：《天府新论》2015年04期

【摘要】：本文试图通过制度与儒家之间的关联,来思考中国传统政治制度以及儒家的特征。钱穆先生关于这个主题的探讨为我们提供了合适的切入视角,他在制度与人事之间更为注重人事,突出强调士人对皇权的制约作用,但是未能充分地强调制度对人事的制约层面。而汉学家列文森则将儒家官僚制与君主制作为"理想型",从而对中国的政治制度与儒家之间的关联进行了思想史上的梳理,这种思路受到了马克斯·韦伯的官僚制分析的影响。列文森是以儒家的现代命运作为基本问题意识,将传统中国向现代的转型作为研究的重点,从而过于强调自宋至晚清这一阶段的思想史,忽略了秦汉以来的经学传统。在这一方面,陈寅恪从儒学内部对中国政治传统与经学关系的论述则为我们提供了一个可以尝试的思路,沿着这个思路我们可以理解干春松教授在《制度化儒家及其解体》一书中所做出的理论上的努力。《制度化儒家及其解体》以权力—真理的关系为枢纽,对自先秦至晚清儒家制度化以及制度儒家化的过程进行了内在融贯的阐述,为我们把握儒家与制度的关系提供了相对整全的视角,同时本书将儒家在现代面临的困境揭示了出来,从而使得本书兼具思想与学术的双重内涵。
[Abstract]:This article tries to think about the traditional Chinese political system and the characteristics of Confucianism through the association between the system and the Confucianism. Mr. Qian Muwei's discussion on this topic provides us with a suitable angle of view. He pays more attention to the personnel between the system and the personnel, emphasizes the restraining effect of the scholars on the imperial power, but not fully emphasized. Levinson, the sinologist, regarded the Confucian bureaucracy and the monarchy as "ideal type", thus combing the relationship between the Chinese political system and the Confucianism, which was influenced by the analysis of Max Webb's bureaucracy. Levinson was based on the modern destiny of Confucianism as the basis. In this question, the transition from traditional China to the modern is the focus of the study, so as to overemphasize the ideological history of the period from the song to the late Qing Dynasty and to ignore the Confucian classics since the Qin and Han Dynasties. In this respect, Chen Yinque provided us with an attempt to discuss the relationship between Chinese political tradition and Confucian classics from the interior of Confucianism. In this way, we can understand the theoretical efforts made by Professor dry Chun song in "institutionalized Confucianism and its disintegration". "Institutionalized Confucianism and its disintegration" are the key to the relationship between power and truth, and the internal integration of the institutionalization of Confucianism from the pre Qin to the late Qing Dynasty and the Confucianism of the system. The relationship between Confucianism and system provides a relatively complete perspective, and this book reveals the dilemma faced by Confucianism in modern times, thus making the book concurrently both ideological and academic.
【作者单位】：北京大学哲学系;
【分类号】：D092

【参考文献】