行动与自由意志:阿伦特的奥古斯丁论题
发布时间：2018-08-09 09:01
【摘要】：阿伦特对公共的行动自由和内在的意志自由做出了严格区分,但她又十分推崇奥古斯丁在这两种自由概念上的重要发现。本文从诞生性和意志概念来考察阿伦特对奥古斯丁自由观的阐释,旨在纠正人们通常对阿伦特行动理论的过分希腊化理解。本文认为,阿伦特既肯定奥古斯丁通过对内在自我的发现揭示意志自身分裂的意涵,从而批判了近代政治思想中的意志主体,又把意志概念与诞生命题相连,从而在心灵时间性上肯定了行动的创新力量。
[Abstract]:Arendt made a strict distinction between public freedom of movement and inherent freedom of will, but she highly praised Augustine's important discoveries in the concepts of these two kinds of freedom. This paper examines Arendt's interpretation of Augustine's concept of freedom from the concepts of nativity and will in order to correct the usual Hellenistic understanding of Arendt's theory of action. This paper holds that Arendt not only affirmed that Augustine revealed the meaning of the will itself through the discovery of the inner self, thus criticizing the subject of will in modern political thought, but also connected the concept of will with the proposition of birth. Therefore, the creative power of action is affirmed in the time of mind.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学哲学系;
【基金】：2013年“上海市浦江人才计划”(13PJC034)资助
【分类号】：D091
[Abstract]:Arendt made a strict distinction between public freedom of movement and inherent freedom of will, but she highly praised Augustine's important discoveries in the concepts of these two kinds of freedom. This paper examines Arendt's interpretation of Augustine's concept of freedom from the concepts of nativity and will in order to correct the usual Hellenistic understanding of Arendt's theory of action. This paper holds that Arendt not only affirmed that Augustine revealed the meaning of the will itself through the discovery of the inner self, thus criticizing the subject of will in modern political thought, but also connected the concept of will with the proposition of birth. Therefore, the creative power of action is affirmed in the time of mind.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学哲学系;
【基金】：2013年“上海市浦江人才计划”(13PJC034)资助
【分类号】：D091
【共引文献】
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 吕绍勋;查尔斯·泰勒与世俗化理论[D];复旦大学;2011年
2 陆建松;上帝、国家与财产权[D];复旦大学;2011年
3 王升平;自然正当、虚无主义与古典复归[D];复旦大学;2011年
4 刘薇;现代政治宽容研究[D];华侨大学;2011年
5 李凯;唯物史观的因果解释模式研究[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
6 李晓敏;科拉科夫斯基宗教理论及现代性反思[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
7 刘雄伟;历史的客观性研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
8 王俊;于“无”深处的历史深渊[D];浙江大学;2005年
9 朱晓U，
本文编号：2173588
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2173588.html
