差异政治、少数群体权利与多元文化主义
发布时间：2019-01-14 17:21
【摘要】：如何建构一套解决文化多元与群体差异问题的政治理论,以及如何通过一定的制度安排来实践这套理论是多元文化主义旨在完成的两项基本任务。为完成这两项任务,多元文化主义内部产生了多个完全不同甚至针锋相对的论证思路。学者在差异类型和差异解决机制这两个关键问题上存在分歧。差异类型关心哪些群体可被称为"文化少数群体"。围绕这一问题,学界形成了"民族文化"和"自由主义普适公民身份"这两种分文化少数群体与多数社会的主流方式。差异解决机制关注应通过怎样的论证逻辑来建构少数群体权利理论。在这一维度,出现了自由主义、社群主义以及女性主义等理论分析路径。
[Abstract]:How to construct a political theory to solve the problem of cultural diversity and group difference and how to practice this theory through certain institutional arrangements are two basic tasks of multiculturalism. In order to accomplish these two tasks, multiculturalism has produced several completely different and even antagonistic argumentation ideas. Scholars are divided on the two key issues of difference type and difference resolution mechanism. The type of difference concerns which groups can be called "cultural minorities". Around this problem, the academic circles have formed "national culture" and "liberal universal citizenship", which are two main ways of subcultural minority groups and majority society. The mechanism of difference resolution focuses on how to construct minority rights theory through reasoning logic. In this dimension, liberalism, communitarianism, feminism and other theoretical analysis approaches emerged.
【作者单位】： 中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目“新兴城市文化流动与文化创新研究”[项目编号:14ZD05]的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D08
[Abstract]:How to construct a political theory to solve the problem of cultural diversity and group difference and how to practice this theory through certain institutional arrangements are two basic tasks of multiculturalism. In order to accomplish these two tasks, multiculturalism has produced several completely different and even antagonistic argumentation ideas. Scholars are divided on the two key issues of difference type and difference resolution mechanism. The type of difference concerns which groups can be called "cultural minorities". Around this problem, the academic circles have formed "national culture" and "liberal universal citizenship", which are two main ways of subcultural minority groups and majority society. The mechanism of difference resolution focuses on how to construct minority rights theory through reasoning logic. In this dimension, liberalism, communitarianism, feminism and other theoretical analysis approaches emerged.
【作者单位】： 中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目“新兴城市文化流动与文化创新研究”[项目编号:14ZD05]的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D08
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王希恩;;多元文化主义与马克思主义民族理论的两点比较[J];科学社会主义;2010年02期
2 威尔·金里卡;焦兵;;多元文化主义的兴衰?关于多样性社会中接纳和包容的新争论[J];国际社会科学杂志(中文版);2011年01期
3 王健;;多元文化主义下的哲学小思[J];理论与改革;2013年03期
4 王希;多元文化主义的起源、实践与局限性[J];美国研究;2000年02期
5 黄皖毅;全球化进程中的多元文化主义[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2002年05期
6 李晶;;西方多元文化主义政策评析[J];马克思主义与现实;2006年06期
7 葛水林;;协商民主与多元文化主义的症结——兼析多元文化主义的发展及其影响[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2009年02期
8 荣司平;;论多元文化主义的缘起[J];学理论;2009年19期
9 常士，
本文编号：2408922
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2408922.html
