从基础主义到“康德式”建构主义——兼论事实与价值在契约式推理中的互契性和局限性
发布时间：2019-01-20 09:05
【摘要】：公平性是契约论的内在诉求,对契约之公平性的证成存在事实和价值两条路径。前者试图用历史事实来说明证成起点的真实性,后者采取思想实验的手段论证证成起点的价值合理性。近代契约论同时诉诸事实和价值,但其基础主义色彩使这两种路径同时失效。当代契约论则以"康德式"建构主义立场将证成重心置于价值维度,引入动态化的思想实验来不断消解证成起点可能带有的独断性。不过,纯粹的价值性论证无法使"康德式"建构主义的契约推理逻辑走向彻底,而是不得不在逻辑推理的起点再次引入事实维度。
[Abstract]:Fairness is the inherent demand of contract theory. The former tries to explain the authenticity of the starting point by historical facts, while the latter proves the value rationality of the starting point by means of ideological experiment. Modern contract theory appeals to fact and value simultaneously, but its basic color makes these two paths invalid simultaneously. On the other hand, the contemporary contract theory puts the center of proof into the value dimension in the "Kantian" constructivism position, and introduces the dynamic thought experiment to constantly dispel the arbitrariness that the starting point of proof may have. However, the pure value argument cannot make the contract reasoning logic of "Kant" constructivism complete, but it has to reintroduce the factual dimension at the starting point of logical reasoning.
【作者单位】： 江南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“政治哲学中的‘康德式’建构主义理论研究”(16YJC720029)的研究成果
【分类号】：D091
本文编号：2411890
[Abstract]:Fairness is the inherent demand of contract theory. The former tries to explain the authenticity of the starting point by historical facts, while the latter proves the value rationality of the starting point by means of ideological experiment. Modern contract theory appeals to fact and value simultaneously, but its basic color makes these two paths invalid simultaneously. On the other hand, the contemporary contract theory puts the center of proof into the value dimension in the "Kantian" constructivism position, and introduces the dynamic thought experiment to constantly dispel the arbitrariness that the starting point of proof may have. However, the pure value argument cannot make the contract reasoning logic of "Kant" constructivism complete, but it has to reintroduce the factual dimension at the starting point of logical reasoning.
【作者单位】： 江南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“政治哲学中的‘康德式’建构主义理论研究”(16YJC720029)的研究成果
【分类号】：D091
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前2条
1 陈嘉明;;基础主义刍论[A];“西文知识论”全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2003年
2 徐向东;;融贯、说明和辩护[A];“西文知识论”全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 ;《千座高原》诠释“非中心”[N];中国房地产报;2005年
2 陶东风;现代性视野中的后现代主义局限[N];中华读书报;2001年
，本文编号：2411890
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2411890.html
