论公共行政实质性推理及其基本类型
发布时间：2019-03-05 12:36
【摘要】：公共行政的工具性推理是公共行政理论研究与行政人员惯常的思维形式,然而,公共行政的工具理性及其思维的局限性已经严重制约了公共行政理论与实践的发展。行政本身的发展在不断地衍生出对于价值理性与实质性推理的迫切需要,20世纪中期的"西蒙/沃尔多之辩"标志着公共行政思维由工具性推理向实质性推理的转换,人们越来越多地关注公共行政领域中的价值追求与伦理关怀,为公共行政及其政策注入价值理性。公共行政实质性推理包括解释性实质推理和批判性实质推理两种基本类型,实践中公共行政只有超越工具性推理的限制,实现工具性推理与实质性推理的有机统一,才能获得对价值多元、充满差异性的社会现实更为深刻的认识,从而制定更能彰显公共行政价值的行政决策。
[Abstract]:Instrumental reasoning of public administration is the theoretical research of public administration and the usual thinking form of administrative personnel. However, the instrumental rationality of public administration and the limitation of its thinking have seriously restricted the development of public administration theory and practice. The development of administration itself is constantly deriving the urgent need for value rationality and substantive reasoning. The "Simon / Waldo debate" in the middle of the 20th century marked the transformation of public administrative thinking from instrumental reasoning to substantive reasoning. People pay more and more attention to the value pursuit and ethical concern in the field of public administration, and inject the value rationality into the public administration and its policies. Substantive reasoning in public administration includes two basic types: interpretive substantive reasoning and critical substantive reasoning. In practice, public administration can only transcend the limitation of instrumental reasoning and realize the organic unity of instrumental reasoning and substantive reasoning. In order to obtain a more profound understanding of the social reality of multi-value, full of differences, so as to make administrative decisions that can more manifest the value of public administration.
【作者单位】： 郑州大学公共管理学院;全国青年伦理学会;全国法律逻辑学会;全国侦查逻辑研究会;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“公共行政核心价值研究”(项目批准号:09BZZ026) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“以公共行政正义最大化为约束条件的服务型政府绩效评估体系优化研究”(项目批准号:2010-JD-008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D035-3
，
本文编号：2434911
[Abstract]:Instrumental reasoning of public administration is the theoretical research of public administration and the usual thinking form of administrative personnel. However, the instrumental rationality of public administration and the limitation of its thinking have seriously restricted the development of public administration theory and practice. The development of administration itself is constantly deriving the urgent need for value rationality and substantive reasoning. The "Simon / Waldo debate" in the middle of the 20th century marked the transformation of public administrative thinking from instrumental reasoning to substantive reasoning. People pay more and more attention to the value pursuit and ethical concern in the field of public administration, and inject the value rationality into the public administration and its policies. Substantive reasoning in public administration includes two basic types: interpretive substantive reasoning and critical substantive reasoning. In practice, public administration can only transcend the limitation of instrumental reasoning and realize the organic unity of instrumental reasoning and substantive reasoning. In order to obtain a more profound understanding of the social reality of multi-value, full of differences, so as to make administrative decisions that can more manifest the value of public administration.
【作者单位】： 郑州大学公共管理学院;全国青年伦理学会;全国法律逻辑学会;全国侦查逻辑研究会;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“公共行政核心价值研究”(项目批准号:09BZZ026) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“以公共行政正义最大化为约束条件的服务型政府绩效评估体系优化研究”(项目批准号:2010-JD-008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D035-3
，
本文编号：2434911
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2434911.html
