中国古代基层社会权威体系及其博弈
发布时间:2019-03-22 09:15
【摘要】:中国古代社会在专制的大背景之下,基层社会还存在着一种特殊的治理模式,即通过国家公权力与民间权威的博弈来实现社会秩序的维系。总体来讲,中国传统社会中存在两种力量,一种自然是代表国家的官府,另一种即是民间力量,习惯上把他们称为乡土精英。国家力量对基层社会的直接控制在历代以及一代的不同时期,其范围与程度都是不断变化的,但国家公权通过对民间权威的"借用"却是始终存在的。这种间接统治的中介力量就是民间权威,其中主要是士绅和宗族。民间力量在为国家力量所用的同时,也获得权力,在家国同构的大背景下,其所引领和推行的民间规则得到了国家的承认,成为基层社会治理链条中的重要一环。
[Abstract]:Under the background of autocracy in ancient Chinese society, there is still a special governance mode in grass-roots society, that is, the maintenance of social order through the game between state public power and folk authority. Generally speaking, there are two kinds of forces in the traditional Chinese society, one is the government which represents the country, the other is the folk power, which is used to call them the local elite. The direct control of the state power over the grass-roots society has been constantly changing in all dynasties and in different periods of the generation, but the state public power has always existed through the "borrowing" of the folk authority. The intermediary force of this indirect rule is folk authority, mainly gentry and clan. At the same time, the folk power is used for the national power, at the same time, it also obtains the power. Under the background of the isomorphism of home and country, the folk rules it leads and promotes have been recognized by the state and become an important link in the chain of social governance at the grass-roots level.
【作者单位】: 天津社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目(11BFX021)
【分类号】:D092
本文编号:2445463
[Abstract]:Under the background of autocracy in ancient Chinese society, there is still a special governance mode in grass-roots society, that is, the maintenance of social order through the game between state public power and folk authority. Generally speaking, there are two kinds of forces in the traditional Chinese society, one is the government which represents the country, the other is the folk power, which is used to call them the local elite. The direct control of the state power over the grass-roots society has been constantly changing in all dynasties and in different periods of the generation, but the state public power has always existed through the "borrowing" of the folk authority. The intermediary force of this indirect rule is folk authority, mainly gentry and clan. At the same time, the folk power is used for the national power, at the same time, it also obtains the power. Under the background of the isomorphism of home and country, the folk rules it leads and promotes have been recognized by the state and become an important link in the chain of social governance at the grass-roots level.
【作者单位】: 天津社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目(11BFX021)
【分类号】:D092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴重庆;孙村的路——“国家——社会”关系格局中的民间权威[J];开放时代;2000年11期
2 菅从进;;论基本权利的受益权能及其主要指向[J];广西社会科学;2008年10期
3 李文亚;;菅从进著《权利制约权力论》出版[J];徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期
4 刘广登;;新视角·新体系·新观点——菅从进《权利制约权力论》一书评介[J];江苏警官学院学报;2010年02期
5 郭巍青,黄岩;日常生活中的权力和政治——以下塘村修祠为例[J];开放时代;2005年02期
6 孙强;;社区警务的社会自治渊源[J];政法学刊;2007年01期
7 涂春元;;国家责任与政府责任辨析[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2007年05期
8 李岩;;论权利的边界[J];法制与社会;2008年32期
9 戴建忠;;论政治资源的权威性分配——政治价值的和谐理念[J];东岳论丛;2009年06期
10 王志勇;;政治稳定视野下“以人为本”的内在逻辑探析[J];科学社会主义;2010年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 本报记者秦平;非政府组织:不容忽视的社会力量[N];法制日报;2003年
,本文编号:2445463
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2445463.html