政策否决、政体类型与比较政治:一项研究议程
发布时间：2019-04-26 22:57
【摘要】：政治发展道路的探索基于科学、严谨的政治知识生产。近年来兴起的否决者理论提供了一种比较政治研究的替代性框架。但是,该理论也存在孤立且静止地看待否决者、忽视纵向否决与历时性否决等不足,其政体观点也不够完善。改进的政策否决模型,沿袭否决者视角,但将否决者置于政策子系统之中,同时将纵向否决、历时性否决等融入其间,且基于改进的政策过程模型。政策否决模型可衍生出新的政体分类标准,即决策体制集权与分权、政策变迁速度、政策制定者产生方式、政策子系统的属性等。新的政体分类方法不仅可以破除仅仅基于民主选举、集权/分权等来划分政体的成见,而且为比较政治研究提供了新的分析框架。
[Abstract]:The exploration of the path of political development is based on scientific, rigorous production of political knowledge. In recent years, the theory of negator provides an alternative framework for comparative political research. However, the theory also has the shortcomings of treating negators in isolation and stillness, neglecting vertical veto and diachronic veto, and its view of polity is not perfect. The improved policy veto model follows the negator's perspective, but puts the negator in the policy subsystem, and integrates the vertical veto, the diachronic veto and so on, and based on the improved policy process model. The model of policy rejection can derive a new classification standard of government, that is, the centralization and decentralization of decision-making system, the speed of policy change, the mode of making policy makers, the attribute of policy subsystem, and so on. The new classification method of polity can not only eliminate the stereotyping of polity based only on democratic election, centralization / decentralization, but also provide a new analytical framework for comparative political research.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学法政学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“当代中国政策制定过程中的否决与共识模式研究”(项目编号:11CZZ020) 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“当代中国政策过程中的政策否决问题研究”(项目编号:10YJC810046)的主要成果之一 上海师范大学重点学科“比较政治学” 151人才计划等支持
【分类号】：D03
本文编号：2466465
[Abstract]:The exploration of the path of political development is based on scientific, rigorous production of political knowledge. In recent years, the theory of negator provides an alternative framework for comparative political research. However, the theory also has the shortcomings of treating negators in isolation and stillness, neglecting vertical veto and diachronic veto, and its view of polity is not perfect. The improved policy veto model follows the negator's perspective, but puts the negator in the policy subsystem, and integrates the vertical veto, the diachronic veto and so on, and based on the improved policy process model. The model of policy rejection can derive a new classification standard of government, that is, the centralization and decentralization of decision-making system, the speed of policy change, the mode of making policy makers, the attribute of policy subsystem, and so on. The new classification method of polity can not only eliminate the stereotyping of polity based only on democratic election, centralization / decentralization, but also provide a new analytical framework for comparative political research.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学法政学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“当代中国政策制定过程中的否决与共识模式研究”(项目编号:11CZZ020) 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“当代中国政策过程中的政策否决问题研究”(项目编号:10YJC810046)的主要成果之一 上海师范大学重点学科“比较政治学” 151人才计划等支持
【分类号】：D03
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王菁;;胡安·林茨民主转型理论述评[J];汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版);2010年02期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2466465
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2466465.html
