《遗山文集》与《归潜志》史料价值比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-20 12:46

本文关键词： 《遗山文集》《归潜志》史料传记诗歌　出处：《赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版)》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文从史料学角度入手,对《遗山文集》与《归潜志》两书中所记载的金代人物小传、对金代事物的评论、诗歌的史料价值进行了比较研究,认为在人物传记方面,《归潜志》所记载人数多,但是多为汉族文人,即使非为汉族文人,其入选也是因为其文学素养较高,故身份重复较多;《遗山文集》中人物数量略少,但是身份多样,在宗教人士、女性、由金入元官员等三方面远远超过《归潜志》,其史料价值更大。在对金代事物的评论和诗歌两方面,《遗山文集》涉及到金代历史的各个方面,丰富程度较《归潜志》更大。故《遗山文集》史料价值超过《归潜志》。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of historical materials, this paper makes a comparative study of the biography of characters in Jin Dynasty, the comments on things in Jin Dynasty, and the value of historical materials of poetry, which are recorded in the Collection of Yishan and the Biography of Gui Qian. In the aspect of biographies, there are many people recorded in Gui Qian Zhi, but most of them are Han literati, even though they are not Han literati, they are also selected because their literary literacy is high, so they have more repeated identities. The number of characters in the collection of essays of Yishan is a little small, but they have a variety of identities. In the three aspects of religious personages, women, and officials from Jin to the Yuan Dynasty, the number of characters far exceeds that of "Gui Qian Zhi". Its historical value is greater. In the comments and poems of the Jin Dynasty, the collection of essays of Yishan involves all aspects of the history of the Jin Dynasty. Therefore, the value of historical materials is higher than that of Gui Qian Zhi.
【作者单位】：吉林大学文学院;
【分类号】：K206
【正文快照】： 《遗山文集》是金、元之交文学家元好问的作品的墓志,而《归潜志》中以小传的形式记载了123人集。元好问,字裕之,号遗山先生。太原秀容(今山西的事迹。元好问与刘祁的记载既有相同点又有不同忻州)人。他生于金章宗明昌元年(1190),卒于蒙古之处。宪宗八年(1257),是我国古代著名

【相似文献】