安田二郎著《六朝政治史研究》评介

发布时间：2018-05-05 06:15

  本文选题：二郎 + 政治史　； 参考：《中国史研究动态》2017年04期

【摘要】：正按六朝史史料,其中《晋书》系唐人重新整理既有史书的产物,而《宋书》等南朝正史则在《南史》成书后部分散佚,直到后世才重新编纂。因此,学者在使用上述史料时,进行史料批判无疑是很必要的。此外,诸书记述亦有偏颇,故对其记载内容的可信与否,也必须将撰者意图包括在内重新予以检讨。安田二郎所著《六朝政治史研究》(京都大学学术出版会,2003年)就是立足六朝史料的这一特征,并对
[Abstract]:According to the historical data of the six dynasties, "Jin Shu" is the product of the Tang Dynasty rearranging the existing historical books, while the official history of the Southern Dynasty, such as "Song Book", was partly lost after the "Southern History" was written, and was not compiled again until later generations. Therefore, scholars in the use of the above-mentioned historical materials, it is undoubtedly necessary to criticize historical data. In addition, the secretaries are biased, so the credibility of their records must also be reviewed to include the intention of the writer. The study of the political History of the six dynasties by Ichiro Okada (academic Publishing Conference of Kyoto University, 2003) is based on this characteristic of the historical materials of the six dynasties.
【作者单位】： 日本德岛大学综合科学学部;首都师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K207.8
，

本文编号：1846568