海域互市与“沉默外交”的得与失——乾隆年间议禁南洋贸易案再考察

发布时间：2018-05-24 00:44

本文选题：红溪惨案 + 议禁南洋贸易案　；参考：《山东社会科学》2016年01期

【摘要】：乾隆五年发生于荷兰殖民地巴达维亚的屠杀华人惨案于翌年传至中国后,清朝政府曾就是否要对荷兰人采取制裁措施、禁止南洋贸易,展开了一年多的讨论,而最后是从贸易利害上考量的观点占了上风。清朝政府未与本属"朝贡国"的荷兰一方进行任何外交交涉便不了了之,实际放弃了在东亚海域积极构筑良性秩序的责任,是决策的失衡。
[Abstract]:After the massacre of Chinese in the Dutch colony of Badawi that occurred in Qianlong five years ago came to China the following year, the Qing government held more than a year of discussion on whether to impose sanctions on the Dutch and ban trade in Nanyang. And finally, the point of view of trade interests prevailed. Without any diplomatic negotiation between the Qing government and the Dutch side, which belongs to the "tributary country", the Qing government gave up the responsibility of actively constructing a benign order in the East Asian Sea, which was an imbalance in decision-making.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“近世日本对中国的贸易管制与区域主导权的争夺研究”(项目编号:15CSS014)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K249.3

【相似文献】