《元经》考论
发布时间:2018-05-24 02:34
本文选题:《元经》 + 王通 ; 参考:《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文的研究主要是希望通过对于《元经》的考证及前人对《元经》的诸多考证来讨论《元经》的真伪问题,丰富对于《元经》的认识与研究。并且通过对于考证方法的运用能够充分了解考证学的始末,以及对同一事件多角度切入的方法进行论证,这些是需要进一步去学习与掌握的。本文将对相关支撑考证《元经》真伪的文献进行梳理与结合,角度新颖的前提,得出自己的结论,也可以为现如今关于《元经》的考证学尽一份力,对文献的发展做出一点贡献。本文共分为三个部分,第一部分是对《元经》的真伪进行讨论,从辨伪学的几个基本方法入手,包括文献流传、避讳、版本等几方面,力图说明断言其为真或为伪的说法均不完全可靠。第二部分是从其文献本身入手,通过与正史的比较研究《元经》的史料价值。第三部分是对《元经》的体例、思想的研究。本文研究的重点是对于《元经》的真伪问题的讨论。前人已对此问题进行了大量研究、考证,想在此基础上更进一步是很有难度的,但结合前人考证、论述提出自己的观点、看法,个人认为还是有一定价值的。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the truth and falsity of Yuan Jing through the textual research of Yuan Jing and many textual research of former generations, and to enrich the understanding and research of Yuan Jing. And through the use of textual research methods can fully understand the beginning and end of textual research, as well as the same incident multi-angle approach to the argument, these are further need to learn and master. This paper will comb and combine the relevant documents supporting the textual research of the Yuan Jing, and draw its own conclusions from a novel perspective, which can also contribute to the textual research on the Yuan Classic today. Make a little contribution to the development of the literature. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is to discuss the truth and falsehood of Yuan Jing, starting with several basic methods of differentiating false from others, including document circulation, taboo, edition and so on. The assertion that it is true or false is not entirely reliable. The second part is from its literature itself, through the comparative study with the official history of the value of historical materials. The third part is the study of the style and thought of Yuan Jing. This paper focuses on the discussion of the authenticity of Yuan Jing. The former has done a lot of research and textual research on this problem. It is very difficult to go further on this basis. However, combining with the former textual research, the author puts forward his own viewpoint and views, and personally thinks that it is still of certain value.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K207
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 玉果轩;马元经;;玉果轩 马元经玉雕工作室[J];兵团工运;2013年11期
2 黄清发;;王通生平著述新证——以新出《王R衲怪尽肺行腫J];晋阳学刊;2012年03期
3 檀明山;家居新理念 风水六十忌[J];资源与人居环境;2005年11期
4 肖承光;;客家住宅中的风水意识[J];设计艺术;2000年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨直;《元经》考论[D];东北师范大学;2017年
,本文编号:1927349
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/1927349.html