新史学和新汉学:中国现代史学的两种形态及其起伏
发布时间：2018-10-17 08:10
【摘要】：中国现代史学是同时循着两条几乎完全不同的路线一步步产生出来的。从乾嘉汉学逐步演化而来的化经为史的过程,是其中的路线之一;生发于"西洋史学"、对中国学术传统而言意味着炉灶重起的过程,则是其中的另一条路线。前者是所谓的"新汉学",后者是所谓的"新史学"。"新史学"是指向历史本体的,"新汉学"则从一开始就是着眼于历史记录的。这两条路径起初各有轨辙,齐头并进,但由于"新汉学"凭借深厚,一段时间内压倒了"新史学";而"新史学"因为符合社会历史潮流、国际学术潮流,又后来居上,再立潮头。"新史学"中经"唯物史观派史学",如今已经开花结果为"中国社会经济史研究";"新汉学"最富有象征性的学术遗产,事实上已经归并到当今的"古籍整理"和"史料学"学科中来了。"新汉学"所主要致力的"文本考据"工作,已变为现代学术构成中的一个部分,治学过程中的一个初始环节;在"文本考据"之外和之后,实际上还存在一个更大的学问世界。
[Abstract]:Modern Chinese historiography emerged step by following two almost completely different routes at the same time. One of the routes is the gradual evolution of Sinology from Qianjia to history, and the process of "Western historiography", which means the stove to rise again to the Chinese academic tradition, is another route among them. The former is the so-called "New Sinology" and the latter is the so-called "New historiography". " New historiography points to historical Noumenon, while New Sinology focuses on historical records from the beginning. At first, the two paths had their own tracks and went hand in hand, but because of the depth of the "New Sinology", it had overpowered the "New historiography" for a period of time, while the "New historiography" came later because it was in line with the social historical trend and the international academic trend. Set the tide again. " New historiography, "Historical materialism School of historiography", has now blossomed into "the study of China's Socio-Economic History"; "New Sinology" is the most symbolic academic heritage. In fact, it has been merged into the disciplines of ancient book sorting and historical materials. " The work of textual research, which New Sinology is mainly devoted to, has become a part of the modern academic structure and an initial link in the course of academic research, and there is in fact a larger world of learning outside and after the textual study.
【作者单位】： 山东大学文史哲研究院
【分类号】：K207.8
本文编号：2276049
[Abstract]:Modern Chinese historiography emerged step by following two almost completely different routes at the same time. One of the routes is the gradual evolution of Sinology from Qianjia to history, and the process of "Western historiography", which means the stove to rise again to the Chinese academic tradition, is another route among them. The former is the so-called "New Sinology" and the latter is the so-called "New historiography". " New historiography points to historical Noumenon, while New Sinology focuses on historical records from the beginning. At first, the two paths had their own tracks and went hand in hand, but because of the depth of the "New Sinology", it had overpowered the "New historiography" for a period of time, while the "New historiography" came later because it was in line with the social historical trend and the international academic trend. Set the tide again. " New historiography, "Historical materialism School of historiography", has now blossomed into "the study of China's Socio-Economic History"; "New Sinology" is the most symbolic academic heritage. In fact, it has been merged into the disciplines of ancient book sorting and historical materials. " The work of textual research, which New Sinology is mainly devoted to, has become a part of the modern academic structure and an initial link in the course of academic research, and there is in fact a larger world of learning outside and after the textual study.
【作者单位】： 山东大学文史哲研究院
【分类号】：K207.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢崇宁;;王国维的治学与日本汉学界[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 王家范;;历史检讨的视域及其多义性[A];时代与思潮（7）——20世纪末的文化审视[C];2000年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 李学勤 清华大学历史系教授;“大发现时代”催生新汉学[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
2 本报记者 杨桂青;李学勤：大发现时代需要新汉学[N];中国教育报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 林镇国;20世纪中国通史编撰史导论[D];华东师范大学;2006年
2 魏衍华;二十世纪中国通史编纂的成就与特征[D];曲阜师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2276049
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2276049.html
