《现观庄严论》之“发菩提心”研究
发布时间:2018-03-28 12:25
本文选题:般若 切入点:大乘发心 出处:《西藏大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:“佛学研究”此外来的新术语,经历了两百多年的崎岖不平的研究发展道路,如今形成了独立的学科体系。它的研究机构不仅在国内的北京大学和中国人民大学,复旦大学等高校,还遍布在以欧洲和北美洲为主的西方人文研究机构和各高等院校。尤其以上述的国内几所大学把佛学研究作为独立的学科来研究和钻研深奥晦涩的佛学内容,也取得了丰硕的学术成果。北京大学哲学系李四龙博士把欧美佛教研究学术史,从佛教研究方法的角度,分为四个阶段:第一,19世纪20-70年代:佛教研究的起步阶段。19世纪80年代到“二战”:佛教研究的成熟阶段。“二战”以后20世纪70年代:佛教研究的中心转移与方法转型。20世纪80年代以来:佛教研究的多元展开与方法反省。这些研究范围包括侧重以文献搜集和整理,翻译,校审等的佛教文献研究。历史人物探究和历史线索,历史沿革为主的佛教历史研究。佛教伽蓝和僧团制度研究。佛教哲学和人文学为注重的佛学研究。佛教考古研究。佛教向关联的雕刻和壁画等着重点的佛教艺术研究。另有女性与佛教等众多新颖的研究方法和内容。本硕士论文选题为现观庄严论之发菩提心研究的初心在于,从佛教文献学的角度发掘现观庄严论有着不可估量的研究价值。西方学者不仅完成了搜集梵语原文和整理的重要部分,还完成了翻译本国语言的最后节点。但藏族学者中研究现观庄严论的研究者寥寥无几,深感遗憾。从佛学研究的角度去研究,对于初学者的我来说它的内容如此庞大和深邃而望尘莫及。为此本文特意以大乘发起心为专题研究,从头到尾重点讨论大乘发起心的核心内容分为三个章节和最后结论,附记和感言等部分组成。本文共三节。第一节中主要依据大乘发心起源于《现观庄严论》的思路,对相关文献进行研究,并论述了《现观庄严论》的作者弥勒确有其人,对此西方学者有何看法,此论何时传入西藏及其后来的发展。还有《现观庄严论》的研究在国际佛学研究当中占有怎样的地位等问题进行研究。第二节是本文的核心部分。笔者用比较宗教学等的研究方法,探讨了大乘发心的道,根,果等理论问题。依据般若类经典深入研究大乘发心的性质和起因,生起及其分类等四个问题:即大乘发心概述,大乘发心的名相和性质方面的比较,大乘发心的分类及其思考等四部分构成。第三节主要论述大乘发心的最终落脚点,即大乘发心与当今社会的关系问题依靠理论进行阐述,从而提出大乘发心理应引导社会道德与规则,把大乘发心之思想从神格化变成人格化,是其对当代社会发展作出应有的贡献。最后呼吁广大学者对藏族伦理学之建设而努力。
[Abstract]:In addition, the new term "Buddhist Studies" has undergone more than 200 years of rugged research and development, and now forms an independent disciplinary system. Its research institutions are not only at Peking University and Renmin University in China. Fudan University and other institutions of higher learning are also found in Western humanistic research institutions and institutions of higher learning, mainly in Europe and North America. In particular, the above-mentioned domestic universities study Buddhist studies as an independent subject to study and delve into the profound and obscure contents of Buddhism. Dr. Li Silong, Department of philosophy of Peking University, has also made fruitful academic achievements. From the perspective of Buddhist research methods, Dr. Li Silong studied the academic history of Buddhism in Europe and the United States. It is divided into four stages: the first stage: the beginning stage of Buddhist study from the 19th century to the 1970s. The beginning stage of Buddhist study. From the 1880s to the "World War II": the mature stage of the Buddhist study. After World War II, the 1970s: the center transfer and method of the Buddhist study. Transformation since the 1980s: pluralistic development and methodological introspection of Buddhist studies. These areas of study include focusing on the collection and collation of documents. Buddhist literature studies in translation, school review, etc. Historical figures and historical clues, Historical evolution of Buddhist history. Study of Buddhist kalan and Sangha system. Buddhist philosophy and humanities as the focus of Buddhist studies. Buddhist archaeological research. Buddhism to the associated carving and murals, the focus of Buddhist art. Research. There are many new research methods and contents, such as women and Buddhism. It is of inestimable value to explore the solemn theory of the present view from the perspective of Buddhist philology. Western scholars have not only completed the collection of the Sanskrit original text and an important part of the arrangement. The final point of translation of the native language has also been completed. However, very few of the Tibetan scholars have studied the present stately view, and it is deeply regrettable that they have done so from the perspective of Buddhist studies. For the beginner, its content is so huge and profound and unreachable. For this reason, this paper purposely takes Mahayana initiative as a special topic study, and focuses on discussing the core content of Mahayana initiation heart from beginning to end, which is divided into three chapters and final conclusions. In the first section, according to the idea that Mahayana originated from "the solemn view of present view", the relevant documents are studied, and the author of Maitreya, Maitreya, has his own people. What do Western scholars think about this? When this theory was introduced into Tibet and its subsequent development, and how the study of the present status in the international Buddhist studies occupied the status of the study. The second section is the core part of this paper. Research methods for teaching, etc., In this paper, we discuss the theoretical problems of Mahayana's origin, root and fruit. According to the classical prajna class, we study in depth the nature and cause of Mahayana's heart-setting, and the four problems, that is, the summarization of Mahayana's heart-setting, the comparison of Mahayana's name and nature, and the classification of Mahayana's heart-setting. The third section mainly discusses the final foothold of Mahayana's heart, that is, the relationship between Mahayana's starting heart and today's society depends on the theory. Therefore, it is suggested that Mahayana should guide social morality and rules and change his thought from deity to personification, which is its due contribution to the development of contemporary society. Finally, it appeals to the scholars to make efforts in the construction of Tibetan ethics.
【学位授予单位】:西藏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B948
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 范德康;刘翠兰;;小议藏文中bam po一词的意义和用法[J];藏学学刊;2009年00期
2 索黛;;浅谈藏文古籍的分类[J];西北民族学院学报;1996年04期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 道吉仁青;《现观庄严论》之“发菩提心”研究[D];西藏大学;2017年
,本文编号:1676315
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/1676315.html