股东知情权司法救济问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-06 13:37

本文关键词：股东知情权司法救济问题研究　出处：《四川省社会科学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着市场经济的发展,社会上大大小小的各类公司如雨后春笋般不断涌现,导致公司类纠纷也持续增多,其中不少涉及到股东知情权救济的内容。股东知情权顾名思义就是股东对公司情况知晓了解的权利,它是法律规定股东享有的一项重要的权利,也是股东实现其股东权和利益的基础性的权利,具有固有权的属性。股东通过享有知情权,不仅可以了解公司经营状况、财务状况和目前所处的发展情况,而且可以了解公司和自身的利益是否受到侵害。知情权救济是股东行使知情权受到阻碍时产生的问题,救济的目的是帮助股东知情权的实现。知情权救济包括私力救济和公力救济,公力救济主要通过司法方式来实现。因此,股东知情权的司法保护就显得非常必要,对知情权司法救济中《公司法》适用问题进行讨论,对于有效地维护公司和股东的合法权益,具有非常现实的理论意义和应用价值。公司发展的重要特点之一就是所有权与经营权的分离,现代社会职业经理人的出现,使这一分离更为明显。“两权分离”使许多股东不再亲历亲为来经营自己出资设立的公司,而是把管理权让渡出去,甚至很少通过公司股东会、董事会来参与公司管理。这使公司所有的日常经营状况、决策事宜都可能被大股东、内部董事和经理等高管人员所控制,由此产生“内部控制人”与其他股东信息严重不对称。如果股东知情权不能得到保障,股东的利益就可能受到侵害;如果股东知情权受到阻碍时不能获得及时有效的救济,无疑会助长内部控制人侵害公司和其他股东利益的不正之风,同时给社会带来负面影响。如果股东能够用好自己的知情权,不仅能够保护好公司和股东的合法权益,而且也能对作为董事、监事、高级管理人员的内部控制人的行为起到有效的约束作用,有利于公司的顺利发展。本文由五部分组成。在绪论里,介绍了选题的背景和意义,国内外研究现状,创新与不足,研究方法等。正文的第一章是对股东知情权的概述,以及它的法律属性进行阐释。第二章是对股东知情权的理论进行研究,以及这些理论对我国司法适用的意义。第三章是对我国股东知情权救济司法适用的难点进行分析,结合司法实践判决,发现司法适用的难点所在,并针对难点原因进行了分析。第四章是基于对股东知情权司法救济难点的考察,运用当前相关理论,结合最高人民法院近期公布的《关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(四)》(征求意见稿),以下简称《公司法司法解释(四)》(征求意见稿),对如何破解司法实践中的难点进行了思考,提出正确适用法律应当把握的若干要点,为《公司法司法解释(四)》的正式实施做些基础性的前期准备。
[Abstract]:With the development of market economy, the society all kinds of large and small companies such as bamboo shoots after a spring rain like emerge, resulting in the company disputes has continued to increase, many related to the shareholders' right to relief content. The shareholders' right to shareholders of the company as the name suggests is the solution of the awareness of rights, it is an important right of shareholders in the law provisions are also shareholders realize its shareholders rights and interests and basic rights, property has the inherent right. Through the shareholder right to know, not only can understand the company's operating conditions, financial situation and the current development situation, but also can understand the company and their own interests are infringed. Right relief is the exercise of shareholders the right to know is hindered when the issue of relief is to achieve the purpose of helping the shareholders the right to know the right remedy. Including private relief and public relief, public remedy The main way to achieve economic justice. Therefore, the judicial protection of shareholder's right to know is very necessary, on the right of judicial relief in company law > < application problems are discussed, to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the company and the shareholders, has very important theoretical significance and application value. The development of the company is one of the important characteristics the separation of ownership and management, modern society occupation managers, so that this separation is more obvious. The "two rights separation" makes many shareholders no longer personally to run their own funded company, but the management rights transfer out, even rarely by the shareholders' meeting, the board of directors to participate in the company management. This makes the company daily operation of all the decisions are likely to be controlled by large shareholders, internal directors and managers, resulting in the "internal control" and other shareholders The serious information asymmetry. If shareholders' right can not be guaranteed, the interests of shareholders may be violated; if the shareholder's right to know is blocked can not get timely and effective relief, will undoubtedly contribute to internal control against the interests of the company and other shareholders of the unwholesome tendencies, and bring negative influence to the society. If the shareholders can use their own right. Not only to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the company and the shareholders, but also as a director of the board of supervisors and senior management personnel, internal control behavior play an effective role in the constraints, is conducive to the development of the company smoothly. This paper consists of five parts. In the introduction, introduces the background and significance, research status at home and abroad innovation, and lack of research methods. The first chapter is an overview of the shareholder's right to know, and it explains the legal attribute. The second chapter is to the shareholders Study of the right to know the theory, and the theory of China's judicial application significance. The third chapter is about the difficulties of China's shareholder's right relief judicial analysis, combined with judicial practice judgment, found difficulty of judicial application, and analyses the difficulties. The fourth chapter is about the judicial relief of the right to know the difficulties based on the investigation, using the related theory, combined with the Supreme People's court recently published "provisions on some issues concerning the application of the" People's Republic of China company law "(four)" (Draft), hereinafter referred to as the "company law judicial interpretation (four)" (draft), on how to solve difficulties in judicial practice of, puts forward some points of the correct application of the law should grasp the "company law judicial interpretation (four) formally implemented" preparation to do some basic.

【学位授予单位】：四川省社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】