法国对“一带一路”倡议战略疑虑态度研究

发布时间：2018-01-09 23:11

本文关键词：法国对“一带一路”倡议战略疑虑态度研究　出处：《北京外国语大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在全球经济联系日益紧密的前提下,很多国家先后启动自由贸易协定谈判,或是提出自己的国际经济贸易发展战略倡议。2013年美国和欧盟启动跨大西洋贸易与投资伙伴协议(TTIP),希望建立美欧自由贸易区。2014年俄罗斯、白俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦三国签署了《欧亚经济联盟条约》,终极目标是建立类似于欧盟的经济联盟,形成一个拥有1.7亿人口的统一市场。在地区一体化进程步入新阶段的背景下,中国领导人审时度势,于2013年提出了建设"丝绸之路经济带"和"21世纪海上丝绸之路"倡议("一带一路"倡议),期待以古代丝绸之路政治互信、经济融合、文化包容的精神,秉承共商共享共建原则,通过陆路和海路两条丝绸之路,改善沿线国家基础设施建设,积极发展与沿线国家的经济合作伙伴关系,迈向政策沟通、贸易畅通、设施联通、资金融通、民心相通为主要内容的互联互通前景。"一带一路"倡议是当今中国外交的重点议程,涉及亚非欧近70个国家,包含全球70%的人口和75%的已探明能源总量,GDP规模总量占全球经济的55%,是当今世界上跨度最长、发展潜力最看好的经济大走廊。无论是陆上丝绸之路经济带还是海上丝绸之路,欧洲都是"一带一路"重要端点,其中中东欧19国是"一带一路"的关键环节。作为欧洲的重要组成部分,西欧各发达国家经济体对"一带一路"倡议的参与意识和积极性日益增加,对"一带一路"倡议在欧洲的推行发挥着重要的作用。首先,西欧发达国家基础设施完善,在高速铁路,航空航天等领域有先进的经验和优势,能够为中国在沿线国家提供基础设施建设提供经验。其次,西欧等发达国家如法、英、德纷纷加入亚洲基础设施投资银行,各国元首也公开表示过愿意积极加入"一带一路"倡议,共同发展。不过,相比于中东欧国家务实地进行各类基建项目,若干西欧国家对于"一带一路"仍持一种观望态度,言语呼吁大过实际行动,法国便是一个典型的例子。本论文的核心问题便是法国为何对"一带一路"倡议持这种态度,通过文献分析法梳理法国对"一带一路"倡议的政治认知,分析其持战略疑虑的政治态度的原因。论文结构安排如下:引论将分析该课题的研究意义以及研究现状。第一章将针对法国各界对于"一带一路"的社会反映,分析该倡议提出后,法国参与"一带一路"取得的各方面成就,主要包括欧盟层面、国家层面和地区层面。法国政界、商界、学界也对"一带一路"有较多的评价,基本上分为两类。一类是认为"一带一路"倡议既为经济合作提供新渠道,又可以为解决亚欧大陆共同的危机提供新思路。另一类则是"中国威胁论""新殖民主义"等反华思潮,认为中国会打破原有的国际社会平衡,并将"一带一路"渲染成中国建立霸权的工具和途径。第二章分析了为何法国在积极呼吁加入"一带一路"之后仍然持保守观望的态度。由于文化、法律的差异、法中贸易结构长期以来的不平衡以及意识形态、价值观的不同和传统人权外交的负面干预仍然会影响法国等西欧国家加入"一带一路"的积极性。最后,部分人将"一带一路"同"马歇尔计划"相提并论,认为中国企图控制欧洲。这些因素都对法国参与"一带一路"带来了不利的影响。第三章针对之前质疑的原因提出了相应的应对方案。针对两国文化差异,中国企业在走出国门前应当仔细研究当地政策法规,入乡随俗。对于长久以来的法中贸易逆.差双方需要改善贸易结构。而基于意识形态领域和价值观不同的"刁难"则需要中国完善对外宣传框架,消除误会,增强互信。同时,在世界多极化和全球治理的背景下,中法两国应当加强在多边事务中的合作,提高"一带一路"实施的有效性。论文目的在于突出国际认知对于"一带一路"推行的重要性,希望吸引更多学者对于"一带一路"倡议国际运行环境的关注,从而为中国有效展开国际合作提供新思路。
[Abstract]:In the premise of the global economy increasingly close contact, many countries have to start negotiations on a free trade agreement, or put forward their own international economic and trade development strategic initiatives.2013 the United States and the European Union started across the the Atlantic trade and investment partnership agreement (TTIP), and hope to establish a free trade Zone in.2014 Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan three countries signed the "the Eurasian Economic Union Treaty", the ultimate goal is economic union similar to the European Union, the formation of a unified market with a population of 170 million. In the background of the integration of the area into the new stage, Chinese leaders in 2013 put forward the construction of "Silk Road Economic Belt" and "twenty-first Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative (" The Belt and Road "initiative), look forward to the ancient Silk Road, political trust, economic integration, cultural tolerance, uphold the total taking sharing principle, through the land Two road and Sea Silk Road, along the country to improve infrastructure construction, actively develop economic partnership with countries along, towards policy communication, trade flow, infrastructure financing, Unicom interconnection prospects of people connected to the main content. "The Belt and Road" initiative is the focus of today's agenda China diplomacy. To Africa and Europe nearly 70 countries, including 70% of the world's population and 75% of the total proven energy, the scale of GDP accounted for 55% of the economy, is the longest span in the world today, the most promising economic corridor development potential. Both land and Sea Silk Road Silk Road Economic Belt, Europe "The Belt and Road important endpoints, including 19 countries in Eastern Europe is the key link Belt and Road Initiative". As an important part of Europe, the western developed economies of The Belt and Road "initiative participation and enthusiasm Increasingly, plays an important role in the Belt and Road Initiative "initiative in Europe in the implementation. First, the western developed countries to improve infrastructure, in the high-speed railway, aerospace and other fields has advanced experience and advantages, to provide Chinese infrastructure in the countries along the construction experience. Secondly, Western Europe and other developed countries such as English, German, have joined the Asian infrastructure investment bank, the heads of state also publicly expressed willingness to actively join the" The Belt and Road "initiative, common development. However, compared to the Eastern European country of all kinds of housework field infrastructure projects, some western countries still hold a wait-and-see attitude toward" The Belt and Road ". The speech called for greater than the actual action, France is a typical example. The core issue of this paper is why France to" The Belt and Road initiative this attitude, combing through the literature analysis of the French "The Belt and Road advocate On the political cognition, analyzes the reasons for the political attitude of the strategic doubts. This thesis is organized as follows: introduction to the analysis of the research significance and research status. The first chapter will focus on the French from all walks of life to the "The Belt and Road" social reflection, analysis of the initiative, France to participate in the "The Belt and Road made the achievements, including the EU level, national level and regional level. The French political, business and academic circles have more evaluation of the" The Belt and Road ", basically divided into two categories. One is that" The Belt and Road "initiative for economic cooperation with new channels, and can provide new ideas in order to solve the Eurasian common crisis. Another is the" China threat theory "and" new colonialism "Anti China trend, that China will break the original balance of international society, and" The Belt and Road rendered into building tools and ways of hegemony in China. Second Chapter analyzes why France actively called for adding "The Belt and Road" remains conservative wait-and-see attitude. Due to cultural differences, law, trade law has long structure imbalance and ideology, values and traditions of different human rights diplomacy negative intervention will still affect France and other Western European countries to join the initiative The Belt and Road ". Finally, some people will be" The Belt and Road "with the" Marshall plan "in that China attempt to control Europe. These factors have adverse effect on France to participate in the" The Belt and Road ". In the third chapter before questioning put forward the corresponding solutions for the cultural differences between the two countries. Chinese, companies should carefully study the local policies and regulations, to go out of the country before the Romans. For trade has long been in poor inverse. Both sides need to improve trade structure. Based on the field of ideology and Different values of the "difficulties" will need Chinese perfect publicity framework, eliminate misunderstanding, enhance mutual trust. At the same time, the multi polarization of the world and the background of global governance, the two countries should strengthen cooperation in multilateral affairs, improve the effectiveness of The Belt and Road implementation. This paper aims to highlight the international recognition for "the importance of The Belt and Road implementation, hoping to attract more scholars for the" The Belt and Road "initiative of the international environment, so as to provide new ideas for China effective international cooperation.

【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F114.4;D835.1

【相似文献】