网络交易平台提供者商标间接侵权中的注意义务研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 10:21

本文关键词：网络交易平台提供者商标间接侵权中的注意义务研究　出处：《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：伴随着我国网络交易平台的快速发展,实践中也出现了一些新的法律问题。近些年来,网络商标侵权案件数量逐年递增,给商标权人造成了巨大的损失,同时也对中国产业升级调整、加强自主知识产权的培育造成了严重的阻碍,商标权人和网络交易平台提供者的矛盾愈演愈烈,而注意义务是妥善解决二者之间矛盾的关键。笔者以网络交易平台提供者商标间接侵权中的注意义务为研究对象,对司法实践中出现的问题进行分析,在现有的研究成果基础上,提出了一些笔者自己的见解。本文分为四章进行分析:第一章是绪论,主要对研究背景、研究意义以及研究方法进行阐述。第二章是网络交易平台提供者商标间接侵权行为分析,网络商标间接侵权行为分析是研究注意义务的基础,笔者主要对网络交易平台提供者在商标间接侵权中的法律地位以及商标间接侵权行为的构成要件进行阐述。通过对国内和国外的主要观点进行分析,认为“新型的交易中介”符合我国网络交易平台提供者的法律地位,笔者还结合注意义务对网络商标间接侵权行为的构成要件进行了阐述。第三章是网络交易平台提供者商标间接侵权中的注意义务现状分析,主要对网络商标侵权领域的注意义务的概念、特征、以及我国的注意义务立法、司法现状进行阐述,归纳出了我国司法实践中存在的两个问题,即注意义务的举证责任方式不合理以及司法实践中对注意义务的认定模糊。第四章是网络交易平台提供者商标间接侵权中注意义务的判断,主要是对改变我国司法实践中注意义务的举证责任方式、以及如何认定网络交易平台提供者的注意义务进行阐述。通过对四个归责原则进行分析比较,笔者认为过错推定原则更适合我国现在的实际情况,通过对注意义务的理论标准进行分析,笔者认为我国应当借鉴英美法系的“三步检验法”和“专家人”标准来指导注意义务的认定。通过对注意义务范围进行探究,笔者认为我国应当利用案例指导制度来明确司法实践中注意义务的判断。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's online trading platform, in practice there have been some new legal issues. In recent years, the number of cases of Internet trademark infringement is increasing year by year, causing huge losses to the trademark owner, but also to upgrade China industry, strengthen the independent knowledge cultivation caused serious intellectual property barriers drastic conflicts of trademark rights and network trading platform provider, and the duty of care is the key to solve the conflict between the two. The research on duty of the online trading platform provider in the indirect trademark infringement, the problems in judicial practice are analyzed, on the basis of the existing research findings, put forward some the author's own opinion. This article is divided into four chapters to analyze: the first chapter is the introduction, mainly on the research background, research significance and research methods in this paper. The second chapter is the network Easy analysis platform provider indirect trademark infringement, trademark indirect infringement of network analysis is the study of the foundation of duty of care, the author mainly on the legal status of the online trading platform provider in the indirect trademark infringement and trademark indirect infringement of the components in this paper. Through the analysis of the main ideas of domestic and foreign, that "new the transaction intermediary" in line with the legal status of a network trading platform provider in China, the author also combines elements of the duty of network trademark infringement behavior were discussed. The third chapter is the analysis of the status of the duty of the network trading platform provider indirect trademark infringement, mainly on the concept, the field of network trademark infringement duty characteristics. And our duty of legislation, judicial present situation carries on the elaboration, summed up the two problems existing in judicial practice of our country That is, pay attention to the way the burden of proof obligations is not reasonable and the judicial practice of the duty of the fuzzy identification. The fourth chapter is to determine the duty that the online trading platform provider indirect trademark infringement, mainly is to change the way the burden of duty of care in the judicial practice in China, as well as how to determine the duty of the online trading platform provider in this paper. Based on the four principles of imputation analysis and comparison, the author thinks that the principle of presumption of fault is more suitable for the actual situation in our country now, based on the theory of attention obligation standard analysis, the author thinks that China should learn from the Anglo American "three step test" and "experts" standard to guide the duty of care identified. Through probing into the scope of the duty of care, the author thinks that China should use case guidance system to clearly determine the duty paid attention to in the judicial practice.

【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】