我国民事立案制度改革研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 21:14

本文选题：民事立案制度　切入点：登记立案　出处：《华侨大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国民事诉讼法并没有“立案”的专门界定,而用的是一审普通程序中关于“起诉和受理”的规定,民事立案制度是贯穿于立案这一过程中的所有制度的合称,包括但不限于起诉制度、受理制度。本文旨在通过对立案登记制以及实务中法院跨域立案、网上立案的实践探索的分析,源于对立案登记制下起诉条件的法律适用及法院审查、案件受理等问题的思考,以及司法实践中跨域立案、网上立案改革的法院实务创新,反思现行的民事诉讼立案制度。试图通过对起诉条件的法律适用、法院审查方式以及对立案制度的突破等的探讨,推动民事诉讼立案制度的再改革。文中将围绕民事立案制度的理论与实务中的重大改革——理论上的登记立案与法院跨域立案、网上立案的司法实践展开论述。其一,通过对立案审查模式的历史转化进程的梳理探讨现行的立案审查模式;其二,从登记立案的改革价值入手,对登记立案的法律适用进行分析、评价,进一步追问立案登记制应当如何适用以及如何推进改革。立案登记制的推行,首要的问题在于包含实体性条件的起诉条件如何在立案登记制下予以适用的问题、实务中各法院登记立案的具体操作问题以及审查形式与诉讼程序进程的关系等问题。其三,从法院跨域立案、网上立案的实践探索出发,通过各法院跨域立案、网上立案的司法实践的运行现状与经验总结,进一步系统梳理实践探索的创新与不足。跨域立案的法院实践探索是在践行立案登记制的基础上,但却并没有完全且实质意义上的“跨域”。网上立案形式的创新使立案不再受地域、时间的限制,但却带有“预约”性。跨域立案、网上立案的共同点在于不受地域管辖的限制,但并未彻底解决与突破民事诉讼的起诉审查与案件受理的问题所在,容易演变成为仅具有“服务”与“便民”标签的单一性改革,无法发挥“登记立案”、“跨域立案”所应当带来的对法院审查形式、以及变革法院立案制度的改革预期。日趋繁重的审判实务给法院系统带来难以承受的审判负担与压力,法院系统诉讼服务、司法为民的同时,何以负荷,是法院系统司法改革的方向。本文试图通过对现有民事立案制度的改革现状,倡导通过现有改革继续推进再改革,建立相关改革配套体制,最终落脚于再改革。
[Abstract]:China's civil procedure law does not have a special definition of "filing a case", but it uses the provisions on "prosecution and acceptance" in the ordinary procedure of first instance. The civil filing system is the collective name of all systems running through the process of filing a case. Including but not limited to the system of prosecution and acceptance. This paper aims to analyze the practice of filing registration system and the cross-domain filing of courts and online filing in practice, which originates from the legal application and court review of the conditions of prosecution under the registration system. Some problems such as case acceptance, cross-domain filing in judicial practice, innovation of court practice in online filing reform, reflection on the current civil litigation filing system, and attempts to apply the law to the conditions of prosecution. The way of court examination and the breakthrough of filing system are discussed in order to push forward the reform of civil procedure filing system. This paper will focus on the important reform in theory and practice of civil filing system-the registration in theory and the cross-domain filing in court. The judicial practice of online filing is discussed. First, through combing the historical transformation process of the mode of filing examination, the author discusses the current mode of filing examination; second, starting with the value of the reform of registration and filing, Analyzing and evaluating the legal application of registration and filing, further asking how the registration system should be applied and how to push forward the reform, and how to carry out the registration system on file, The first problem lies in the question of how the prosecution conditions involving substantive conditions can be applied under the registration system, the specific operation of the court registration and the relationship between the form of examination and the process of the proceedings in practice. Proceeding from the practical exploration of court cross-domain filing and online filing, this paper summarizes the current situation and experience of judicial practice of cross-domain filing and online filing of cases in various courts. Further systemically combing the innovation and deficiency of the practical exploration. The cross-regional court practice exploration is based on the practice of the registration system. However, there is no "cross-domain" in the real and complete sense. The innovation of online filing forms makes the case no longer subject to the limitation of region and time, but with the "reservation" nature. The common point of online filing is that it is not subject to the restriction of regional jurisdiction. However, it has not completely solved and broken through the problems of prosecution examination and case acceptance in civil litigation, and has easily evolved into a single reform with the label of "service" and "convenience for the people". Unable to give full play to "registration and filing", the form of court examination that "cross-regional filing" should bring, as well as the expectation of reforming the court filing system. The increasingly onerous trial practice brings unbearable burden and pressure to the court system. The court system litigation service, the judicature for the people at the same time, how to load, is the court system judicial reform direction. This article attempts through the existing civil filing system reform present situation, advocates through the existing reform to continue to push forward the reform. The establishment of relevant reform supporting system, the final settlement in the re-reform.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】