全面深化改革进程中社会矛盾治理精细化问题研究
发布时间:2018-03-25 13:21
本文选题:社会矛盾 切入点:治理精细化 出处:《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:当前,我国处于改革深水区和攻坚期;经济换挡期和“矛盾凸显期”各种矛盾和风险交织在一起,面对的风险和机遇前所未有。同时,在传统维稳理念和体制机制下,出现了“越维越不稳”的现象。为了更好的实现社会的矛盾治理。从党的十八到十八届五中全会,一直致力于社会治理体制的创新,随着社会治理精细化理念的提出,精细化成为社会矛盾治理的重要内容,成为渡过“矛盾凸显期”重要保障。随着全面深化改革推进和现代化进程的加速,社会矛盾治理正处于改革的深水期,矛盾治理精细化面对的挑战是复合型问题。从矛盾治理理念上以人民为中心立场不牢固;从矛盾治理主体上,社会矛盾治理精细化主体的多元格局没有形成;此外,治理方式体制机制不完善;矛盾精细化治理效果评价体系不合理;社会矛盾治理精细化策略还局限于传统的维稳体制等一系列问题无不影响着精细化治理的深入。究其原因,包括中国传统文化中的粗放型思维;计划经济下全能型政府矛盾管控体制;压力型体制下政府的运动式治理方式;轻视矛盾治理中的大数据建设造成的。中共十八届五中指出:“推进社会治理精细化,构建全民共建共享的社会治理格局。”这也为社会矛盾治理体制机制的全面创新提出了指导思想。既要从矛盾治理理念上,确立以人民为中心的治理理念。还要从体制机制上,探索社会治理从“粗放化社会管理”向“精细化社会治理”转变。此外,以网格作为联接点,以大数据技术为依托,将“大数据精准技术”与“社会治理”有机结合起来,提升矛盾治理的精准度,也是实现社会矛盾治理精细化的必然趋势。因此,必须完善社会矛盾治理精细化的总体规划和发展战略,从宏观上的矛盾治理理念、中观上的矛盾治理体制机制创新、微观上的大数据使用的协同发力。首先,我们应该完善社会矛盾治理理念立场和观点。其次,构建政府主导公众参与的多元主体共治,最后,构建社会矛盾治理精细化的治理方式。
[Abstract]:At present, China is in a period of deep water reform and a period of attack; the period of economic shift and the period of "contradiction highlighting" are intertwined with various contradictions and risks, facing unprecedented risks and opportunities. At the same time, under the traditional concept of maintaining stability and the institutional mechanism, In order to achieve better governance of social contradictions, from the 18th to the 18th Plenary session of the CPC Central Committee, we have been devoting ourselves to the innovation of the social governance system. With the development of the concept of social governance refinement, Refinement has become an important part of the governance of social contradictions and an important guarantee for getting through the period of "contradiction highlighting." with the overall deepening of reform and the acceleration of the modernization process, the governance of social contradictions is in the deepwater period of reform. The challenge of conflict management refinement is a complex problem. The concept of conflict management is not firm with the people as the central position; from the perspective of the contradiction governance subject, the multiple pattern of the social contradiction management refinement subject is not formed; in addition, The system mechanism of governance mode is not perfect, the evaluation system of conflict fine governance effect is unreasonable, the fine strategy of social contradiction management is also limited to the traditional maintenance system, and a series of problems, such as the deepening of fine governance, are all affected. It includes extensive thinking in Chinese traditional culture, omnipotent government management and control system under planned economy, government movement-based governance mode under pressure-type system; Despising the construction of big data in conflict management. In the fifth session of the 18th CPC Congress, it was pointed out: "to advance social governance is refined," This also provides a guiding ideology for the overall innovation of the system of governance of social contradictions. It is necessary to establish the concept of governance with the people as the center from the perspective of the concept of governance of contradictions, and also from the point of view of the system and mechanism. To explore the transformation of social governance from "extensive social management" to "refined social governance". In addition, taking the grid as the connection point and relying on big data's technology, the paper organically combines the precision technology of "big data" with "social governance". Therefore, it is necessary to improve the overall planning and development strategy of the management of social contradictions, and to improve the concept of the management of contradictions from the macro perspective. The innovation of the system and mechanism of conflict governance in the middle view and the synergistic power used by big data at the micro level. First, we should perfect the stand and viewpoint of the concept of social conflict management. Secondly, we should build a multi-subject co-governance system in which the government dominates the participation of the public. Finally, The construction society contradiction manages the fine management way.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高炜,吴艳;谈传统文化中的消极因素[J];前沿;2002年09期
2 丁煌;政府的职责:“服务”而非“掌舵”——《新公共服务:服务,而不是掌舵》评介[J];中国人民大学学报;2004年06期
3 Tom Christensen;Per Lgreid;张丽娜;袁何俊;;后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J];中国行政管理;2006年09期
4 陈先毅;施倩;;对数字化网格化城市管理的理论思考[J];上海经济研究;2006年01期
5 李超,安建增;论我国地方政府治理的模式选择及其对策[J];陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
6 陈平;依托数字城市技术 创建城市管理新模式[J];中国科学院院刊;2005年03期
7 卢向国;;论中国古代“官本位”政治文化的基本成因[J];理论界;2006年08期
8 俞可平;;中国治理评估框架[J];经济社会体制比较;2008年06期
9 张康之;;论社会治理中的职业化及其技术控制[J];中共杭州市委党校学报;2013年03期
10 蒋源;;社会精细化治理新路径探索[J];人民论坛;2015年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 ;探索首都社会治理新模式 提升北京精细化管理水平[N];人民政协报;2014年
2 何增科;;国家治理现代化及其评估[N];学习时报;2014年
,本文编号:1663302
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1663302.html