检察环节认罪认罚从宽制度的适用和完善

发布时间：2018-03-25 21:47

本文选题：认罪认罚从宽　切入点：法律监督　出处：《四川省社会科学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：十八届四中全会决定提出要完善认罪认罚从宽制度,将其作为实现“以审判为中心”的司法制度改革的重要举措。在认罪认罚从宽制度中,检察机关需对犯罪嫌疑人指控的罪名、从宽量刑、案件的适用程序等事项做出决定或者提出建议。相较于侦查机关只是将犯罪嫌疑人自愿认罪认罚在移送审查起诉时做出说明和法院主要对认罪认罚自愿性及检察机关量刑建议的公允性进行审查,可以说检察机关在认罪认罚案件中发挥着最为重要的作用。如何更好的发挥检察机关在认罪认罚从宽制度中的作用,也就成为该制度有效运行的关键。本文第一章是认罪认罚从宽制度的基本概述。本章主要论述了认罪认罚从宽制度的内涵、认罪认罚与辩诉交易制度和庭前认罪答辩程序间的区别以及认罪认罚从宽制度的价值取向,包括提高诉讼效率、顺应刑罚轻刑化理念、有利于犯罪人回归社会、探索非对抗性诉讼格局和优化司法资源配置。本文第二章阐述了认罪认罚从宽制度对检察机关带来的影响。第一检察机关法律监督权需要强化;第二是对检察机关刑事诉讼权利的影响,包括对批准逮捕权的影响和审查起诉权的影响;第三是对检察机关司法实践工作的影响,包括控方证明责任的变化、诉讼对抗的前移和检察机关工作中心的前移。本文第三章提出检察环节适用认罪认罚从宽制度存在的问题,分为法律制度层面问题和司法实践层面问题两个方面。法律制度层面的问题包括犯罪嫌疑人权利保障机制不健全、犯罪嫌疑人认罪认罚的法律后果的不明确、检察环节认罪认罚量刑规范不健全、认罪认罚从宽建议对检察机关的效力不明以及被害人权利被忽视。司法实践层面的问题包括检察机关工作负担的加重、犯罪嫌疑人虚假认罪问题和检察机关自由裁量权较小。本文第四章针对检察环节适用认罪认罚从宽制度存在的问题提出相应的建议,分为法律制度层面的完善和现实困境的解决。法律制度的完善包括犯罪嫌疑人权利保障机制的构建、检察机关量刑建议规范的完善、认罪认罚从宽协议对检察机关效力的明确以及被害人权利保护的重视。现实困境的解决措施包括检察机关工作负担的减轻、犯罪嫌疑人虚假认罪的审查以及检察官自由裁量权的扩大。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee decided to improve the leniency system of guilty admission and punishment as an important measure to realize the reform of the judicial system with "trial as the center". The procuratorial organs should be lenient in sentencing the charges charged by the criminal suspects. Decisions or suggestions are made on matters such as the procedure applicable to the case... As opposed to the fact that the investigating authorities only explain the criminal suspect's voluntary admission of guilt and punishment at the time of the examination of the prosecution and the court mainly on the voluntary and prosecutorial nature of the guilty plea. The fairness of the sentencing recommendations of the organs shall be examined, It can be said that the procuratorial organ plays the most important role in the case of confession and punishment. How to better play the role of the procuratorial organ in the lenient system of confession and punishment, The first chapter of this paper is a basic overview of the leniency system of guilty pleas and punishments. This chapter mainly discusses the connotation of the leniency system of guilty admission and punishment. The difference between plea admission and punishment, plea bargaining system and plea plea defense procedure before trial, and the value orientation of lenient plea admission and punishment system, including improving the efficiency of litigation, complying with the concept of light punishment of punishment, is conducive to the return of criminals to society. In the second chapter, the author expounds the influence of the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment on the procuratorial organ. The first chapter needs to strengthen the legal supervision power of the procuratorial organ. The second is the influence on the criminal litigation rights of the procuratorial organs, including the influence on the power to approve arrest and the influence on the right to examine the prosecution; the third is the influence on the judicial practice of the procuratorial organs, including the change of the burden of proof of the prosecution. The third chapter of this paper points out the problems existing in the application of the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing in the procuratorial link. It is divided into two aspects: the legal system level and the judicial practice level. The legal system level includes the criminal suspects' rights protection mechanism is not perfect, and the legal consequences of the criminal suspects' confession and punishment are not clear. In the procuratorial link, the sentencing criterion of guilty admission and punishment is not perfect, the leniency of plea admission and punishment is not clear to the procuratorial organ and the victim's rights are ignored. The problems in judicial practice include the increase of the work burden of the procuratorial organ. The problem of false admission of guilt of criminal suspects and the discretion of procuratorial organs are relatively small. In the fourth chapter of this paper, the author puts forward corresponding suggestions on the problems existing in the application of lenient admission and punishment system in procuratorial links. The perfection of the legal system includes the construction of the protection mechanism of the criminal suspect's rights, the perfection of the standard of the procuratorial organ's sentencing suggestion, the improvement of the legal system and the solution of the practical dilemma. The agreement on leniency of plea, admission and punishment is clear about the effectiveness of procuratorial organs and the importance attached to the protection of the rights of victims. The solutions to the practical difficulties include the reduction of the work burden of procuratorial organs, The examination of false confession of criminal suspects and the expansion of the discretionary power of prosecutors.
【学位授予单位】：四川省社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】