当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 社科硕士论文 >

城管执法领域行政处罚自由裁量权基准研究

发布时间:2018-03-26 11:31

  本文选题:城市管理 切入点:行政处罚 出处:《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:现代社会的发展需要政府提供全面、优质的公共服务,行政机关只有拥有一定的行政自由裁量权,才能适应发展的需要。但在实践过程中,行政自由裁量权存在于行政行为的各个环节中,裁量空间偏大,易被滥用,对行政相对人的合法权益造成损害,进而损害法律的效力和权威,因此对行政自由裁量权的控制便成为了行政法学界讨论研究的热点问题。近年来,在行政自由裁量权控制的理论和实践研究中,行政处罚自由裁量权基准制度以其特有的优势引起了人们的普遍关注,在全国范围内广泛运用,通过实践证明了其自身存在的价值。但毕竟行政自由裁量权基准制度产生时间较短,在理论研究和实践经验积累方面明显不足,所以其自身存在的问题也是不容忽视的。为了便于研究,笔者特意选取了较为典型的城市管理综合执法领域行政处罚自由裁量权作为切入点,直面当前城市管理所面临的种种难题,通过详细剖析自由裁量权基准制度在城市管理行政处罚中的存在价值和理论、实践中的困惑,继而提出完善方案,以期改变当前城市管理综合执法所面临的“管与不管皆受质疑”的尴尬境地,从而实现摊贩的生存权、城管执法人员管理权和城市公共秩序的合理平衡。
[Abstract]:The development of modern society requires the government to provide comprehensive and high-quality public services. Only when the administrative organs have certain administrative discretion, can they adapt to the needs of development. The administrative discretion exists in every link of the administrative act. The discretion space is too large and easy to be abused, which damages the legal rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, and then damages the validity and authority of the law. Therefore, the control of administrative discretion has become a hot issue in the field of administrative law. In recent years, in the theory and practice of administrative discretion control, With its unique advantages, the benchmark system of discretion of administrative punishment has aroused widespread concern and has been widely used throughout the country. It has proved its own existence value through the practice, but after all, the administrative discretion standard system produces the time is short, in the theory research and the practice experience accumulation aspect obviously lacks, So its own problems can not be ignored. In order to facilitate the study, the author has chosen the relatively typical discretion of administrative punishment in the field of comprehensive law enforcement of urban management as the starting point. Facing all kinds of difficult problems that the city management faces at present, through the detailed analysis of the value and theory of the standard system of discretion in the administrative punishment of the city management, the puzzlement in practice, and then put forward the perfect plan. The purpose of this paper is to change the awkward situation of "management or doubt" faced by the comprehensive law enforcement of urban management at present, so as to achieve a reasonable balance between the rights of vendors, the management power of urban management law enforcement personnel and the public order of the city.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈碧红;;论城管行政自由裁量权的控制对策[J];广西社会科学;2014年03期

2 高秦伟;;论行政裁量的自我拘束[J];当代法学;2014年01期

3 关保英;;行政自由裁量基准质疑[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年03期

4 戴建华;;裁量基准效力研究[J];法学评论;2012年02期

5 杜健荣;;行政处罚自由裁量基准设定的合理化[J];南都学坛;2012年01期

6 黄学贤;;行政裁量基准:理论、实践与出路[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2009年06期

7 郑文兵;;行政处罚自由裁量权的行使与控制[J];佳木斯大学社会科学学报;2009年06期

8 王锡锌;;行政自由裁量权控制的四个模型——兼论中国行政自由裁量权控制模式的选择[J];北大法律评论;2009年02期

9 王春业;;论基准制度及其法制化——以行政处罚为例[J];河北法学;2009年06期

10 桂步祥;论行政自由裁量权及其法律规制[J];江苏广播电视大学学报;2002年04期



本文编号:1667712

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1667712.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0803c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com