隐名股权执行法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-26 13:18

本文选题：隐名股权　切入点：强制执行　出处：《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,随着经济活动中隐名投资者的增多,我国公司法领域中有关隐名股权纠纷的案件也越来越多。在执行领域,也经常会遇到涉及隐名股权的执行案件。但是,我国现行法律并没有关于隐名股权执行的明确规定,法院在实践中处理隐名股权执行案件时大多参照对公司股权的强制执行规定,但隐名股权毕竟有其特殊性。由于法律的不完善,实践中对隐名股权执行采取的标准并不一致,同类案件有可能产生了不同的裁判结果。本文通过对我国隐名股权强制执行程序中存在的问题进行归纳总结,对相关法律问题进行分析论证,试图探索指导隐名股权强制执行的的统一规则,这对统一裁判尺度、树立司法权威、推进解决执行难、维护当事人合法权益具有十分重要的意义。本文通过研读文献以及分析案例的方法,对隐名股权的强制执行问题进行了较为系统的研究。本文作者认为,当名义股东为被执行人时,隐名股东可以通过提起案外人执行异议以及案外人执行异议之诉来主张自己的合法权益,在案外人执行异议之诉中,如果能够确定隐名股东确为案涉股权的实际权利人,法院不得对该股权采取强制执行措施。当隐名股东为被执行人时,申请执行人可以向法院提起“申请执行人代位变更诉讼”,明确隐名股东实际权利人的法律地位,进而对隐名股权采取强制执行措施,实现债权的清偿。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increase of hidden investors in economic activities, there are more and more cases of dormant equity disputes in the field of corporate law in our country. The current law of our country does not have the explicit stipulation about the execution of the dormant equity. When the court deals with the cases of the execution of the dormant equity in practice, most of them refer to the enforcement of the company's equity. Due to the imperfection of the law, the standards adopted for the implementation of the dormant equity in practice are not consistent. Similar cases may have different adjudication results. This paper summarizes the problems existing in the enforcement procedure of anonymous equity rights in China, and analyzes and demonstrates the relevant legal issues. This paper attempts to explore the uniform rules to guide the enforcement of anonymous equity rights, which will help to unify the judgment standards, establish the judicial authority, and promote the resolution of the difficulty of enforcement. It is of great significance to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. This paper, by studying the literature and analyzing cases, makes a systematic study on the enforcement of anonymous equity. When the nominal shareholder is the executor, the dormant shareholder may assert his legitimate rights and interests by filing the objection of execution by the foreign party in the case of the case and by the action of the objection of the alien in the case of the case, and in the case of the action of dissent by the foreign party in the case, If it can be ascertained that the dormant shareholder is the actual owner of the equity involved in the case, the court may not take enforcement measures against the shareholding. The application executor can apply to the court to "apply for the action of subrogation of executor", clarify the legal status of the actual obligee of the dormant shareholder, and then take the enforcement measures against the dormant equity to realize the liquidation of the creditor's rights.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】