“庸官懒政”治理背景下的行政问责研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 11:46

本文选题：“庸官懒政”　切入点：行政问责　出处：《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前“庸官懒政”问题十分突出。论文阐述和分析了“庸官懒政”的概念和表现形式,对当前的治理进行了综述和评价,认为行政问责是“庸官懒政”治理的必由路径。一方面,行政问责的惩戒性和威慑力,通过问责亮剑,能从很大程度上对“庸官懒政”现象有“刹车”功效。另一方面,完善的行政问责制度和行政问责实施是“庸官懒政”综合治理的重要组成部分。“庸官懒政”问题突出也深刻反映了当前行政问责体系和行政问责实施还存在诸多问题,以至于治理效果不显著。因此,当前寻求“庸官懒政”标本兼治、综合治理的路径之时,如何更好地实施行政问责,提升行政问责的治标、治本之效,值得研究和探讨。研究分析了当前行政问责的现状、存在的问题和原因。认为:当前行政问责实施中存在的问题主要表现在同体问责与异体问责互动不充分,问责实施不精准和问责成效不显著。而造成行政问责实施困境的原因主要有:问责机制未完善,问责主体未尽其能和问责客体未能分类实施。从五个方面对此进行了分析,并提出了推进行政问责实施的可行路径:(1)从建立国家层面的行政问责实施办法、培育行政问责文化、规范行政职权和责任清单等方面做好机制保障。(2)从保障异体问责、监察机关履职、相关部门配合、加强问责考核等方面加强问责主体的合力。(3)从依据权限、有责必问、以事问责等方面促进问责客体分类实施。(4)从拓展线索渠道、严格实施问责、注重抓早抓小等方面保障实施精准化。(5)从信息公开、惩处衔接、回访跟进等方面保障问责成效。研究还认为,在“庸官懒政”治理的背景下,推进行政问责的实施,亟需突破的路径是发挥基层行政机关的能动性,保证行政问责的实施频率,抓早抓小,改变目前行政问责实施的结构分层,让行政问责轻处分在占比中成为大多数,打牢行政问责金字塔的塔底。
[Abstract]:At present, the problem of "mediocre official lazy government" is very prominent. This paper expounds and analyzes the concept and manifestation of "mediocre official lazy government", and summarizes and evaluates the current governance. On the one hand, the disciplinary nature and deterrent power of administrative accountability, through accountability, can to a large extent "brake" the phenomenon of "mediocre officials lazy government", on the other hand, the administrative accountability is the necessary path to the governance of the "mediocre officials lazy". On the one hand, the disciplinary nature and deterrence of administrative accountability, through accountability, can, to a great extent, "brake" the phenomenon. The perfect system of administrative accountability and the implementation of administrative accountability is an important part of the comprehensive management of "the lazier government of the mediocre officials". The problem of "the lazy government of the mediocre officials" highlights and profoundly reflects that there are still many problems in the current administrative accountability system and the implementation of the administrative accountability. As a result, the effect of governance is not remarkable. Therefore, when we seek the path of comprehensive management, how to implement administrative accountability better, improve the symptoms of administrative accountability, and cure the root cause, when we are looking for the path of "mediocre officials lazy government", how to improve the effectiveness of administrative accountability, and how to improve the effectiveness of administrative accountability. It is worth studying and discussing. The present situation, existing problems and reasons of administrative accountability are analyzed. It is considered that the main problems in the implementation of administrative accountability are that the interaction between homologous accountability and allogeneic accountability is not sufficient. The reasons for the difficulties in the implementation of administrative accountability are as follows: the accountability mechanism is not perfect, the accountability subject is not able to do its best and the accountability object has not been implemented by classification. And put forward the feasible way to promote the implementation of administrative accountability: 1) from the establishment of the implementation of administrative accountability at the national level, to foster a culture of administrative accountability, to standardize the administrative authority and responsibility list and other aspects of the mechanism to protect accountability. The supervisory organs carry out their duties, the relevant departments cooperate with each other, strengthen the resultant force of the accountability subjects in such aspects as strengthening the accountability examination, etc.) promote the implementation of the classification of the object of accountability from the aspects of authority, responsibility, accountability, etc.) from the aspects of expanding clue channels and strictly enforcing accountability, Pay attention to ensuring the implementation of precision from the aspects of information disclosure, punishment convergence, follow-up visits and so on. The research also believes that under the background of "mediocre officials lazy government" governance, the implementation of administrative accountability should be promoted. The way to break through is to give full play to the initiative of the administrative organs at the grassroots level, to ensure the implementation frequency of the administrative accountability, to grasp the small ones as early as possible, to change the structure stratification of the current implementation of the administrative accountability, and to make the light punishment of the administrative accountability become the majority in the proportion. Strengthen the bottom of the pyramid of administrative accountability.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D262.6

【相似文献】