当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 社科硕士论文 >

三网融合下信息网络传播权与广播权重构的理论与实践研究

发布时间:2018-05-06 11:24

  本文选题:三网融合 + 信息网络传播权 ; 参考:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:自2000年首提三网融合概念以来我国在三网融合方面进行了大量的尝试,2015年国务院颁布的《三网融合推广方案》标志着三网融合在我国开始了全面推广的进程。三网融合带来的便利显而易见,但是设备终端的多功能化在给用户带来便利的同时也给著作权法尤其是信息网络传播权和广播权层面带来了极大的冲击。究其原因,一是由于立法本身的滞后属性,二是我国著作权法中关于信息网络传播权与广播权的法律设置与技术层面联系太深。我国学界先后提出了多种重构方案,然而对于重构方案的理论依据和实践支撑尚缺乏深入的分析和探索。以学界现有的重构方案为出发点,通过对现有重构方案进行分类与评价,选择技术中立的远程传播权重构方案作为研究对象;横向对比我国立法与世界的向公众传播权,为远程传播权重构方案的选择寻求理论支撑;通过剖析我国司法中的典型案例提出对信息网络传播权与广播权进行重构的现实需求;结合我国著作权法草案的修改历程提出送审稿中对播放权和信息网络传播权的规定在三网融合的大趋势下并非长久之计,三网融合并随的技术融合局面要求立法必须保持足够的技术中立,远程传播权的行为主义立法路径是较为明智的选择,同时对远程传播权进行了简单细化。
[Abstract]:Since the concept of triple network fusion was first put forward in 2000, China has made a great deal of attempts in the field of triple network integration. In 2015, the State Council promulgated the "Tri-Network Fusion Promotion Program", which marks the beginning of the process of all-around promotion of Tri-net Fusion in China. The convenience brought by the integration of three networks is obvious, but the multifunction of the equipment terminal not only brings convenience to the user, but also brings great impact to the copyright law, especially the information network transmission right and the broadcasting right level. The reasons are, firstly, the lagging attribute of the legislation itself, and second, the legal setting and technical connection between the right of information network communication and the right of broadcasting in the copyright law of our country are too deep. The academic circles of our country have put forward many kinds of reconstruction schemes, but the theoretical basis and practical support of the reconstruction schemes are still lack of deep analysis and exploration. By classifying and evaluating the existing reconstruction schemes, the author chooses the technology neutral reconstruction scheme as the research object, and compares the legislation of our country with the public transmission right in the world. By analyzing the typical cases in our country, the author puts forward the realistic demand for the reconstruction of information network communication right and broadcasting right. According to the revision course of the draft copyright Law of our country, it is not a long-term plan to put forward the regulations on broadcast right and information network transmission right in the draft submitted for review under the general trend of the integration of three networks. The integration of three networks and accompanying technology requires legislation to maintain sufficient technical neutrality. The behaviorist legislative path of remote communication right is a more sensible choice, and the remote communication right is simply refined.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 冯晓青;费氧;;互联网电视著作权侵权问题研究[J];知识产权;2016年02期

2 祝建军;;“三网融合”著作权案件梳理与问题分析[J];电子知识产权;2016年01期

3 王迁;;论广播组织转播权的扩张——兼评《著作权法修订草案(送审稿)》第42条[J];法商研究;2016年01期

4 何怀文;;我国著作人身权与著作财产权协调的法律原则[J];知识产权;2015年09期

5 鲍征烨;;IPTV版权问题探析——以“回看”模式为例[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2015年04期

6 苏志甫;;网络著作权保护法律适用问题研究——以法院相关判例为切入点[J];知识产权;2015年06期

7 王言昭;;新媒体背景下我国体育赛事转播权的保护研究[J];山东体育学院学报;2015年01期

8 王迁;;IPTV限时回看服务性质研究[J];中国版权;2015年01期

9 张照龙;;论三网融合下对广播权和信息网络传播权重构方案的选择[J];传播与版权;2014年12期

10 车红蕾;;司法经验是完善信息网络传播权制度的宝贵资源[J];人民司法;2014年19期



本文编号:1852122

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1852122.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1f50c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com