民事诉讼中的证人保证书问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 17:14

本文选题：民事诉讼证人保证书 + 宣誓或具结　；参考：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国民事诉讼“正式”引入证人保证书制度,其虽然是由最高人民法院对《民事诉讼法》的司法解释创制的,但其已经生效并在全国各级法院得到实施。证人保证书被引入到民事诉讼中,具有体现落实诚实信用原则、提高诉讼效率、节约司法资源、实现程序正义的意义。民事诉讼证人保证书同宣誓或者具结等形式一样,都是保证证人证言可信性的手段,但是三者之间也有差别。梳理大陆法系的德国、法国、日本和英美法系的英国、美国以及我国台湾地区对保证证人证言可信性的规定,总结了可借鉴的经验。即就保证证人证言可信性的规定的渊源而言,大都是法律规定;就其规定的完备程度而言,较为详细完备;最重要的是整个程序体现出了对程序正义的尊重与重视。对我国民事诉讼证人保证书的考察,主要是从立法和实践两个方面进行。一方面,立法现状主要是对民事诉讼证人保证书作出规定的《民事诉讼法司法解释》的梳理;另一方面,在实践现状方面细分为证人保证书的适用范围、格式与内容、在案例中的适用三个小的方面。通过考察发现我国民事诉讼证人保证书存在着诸如对民事诉讼证人保证书的认可度不一、关于民事诉讼证人保证书的规定过于简单、民事诉讼证人保证书的“广泛”适用流于形式的问题。民事诉讼证人保证书应该是一个被充分发挥的保证证人证言可信性的有效手段,和同属于保证证人证言可信性手段的宣誓或具结一样,当与具体的国家司法实践相结合时,就要发生一定的改变,以求更符合司法实践。通过分析我国民事诉讼证人保证书存在的问题,结合有关国家和地区的可借鉴的经验之后,建议我国民事诉讼证人保证书的完善措施为:重视程序正义的指导作用,《民事诉讼法》明确规定证人保证书,以及细化民事诉讼证人保证书的实施。
[Abstract]:The "formal" introduction of the witness guarantee system in civil proceedings in China was created by the Supreme people's Court in the judicial interpretation of the Civil procedure Law, but it has come into effect and has been implemented in courts at all levels throughout the country. Witness guarantee is introduced into civil action, which embodies the principle of good faith, improves the efficiency of litigation, saves judicial resources and realizes procedural justice. The bond of witness in civil action is the same as the form of oath or knot, which is the means to guarantee the credibility of witness testimony, but there are also differences among them. This paper reviews the rules of Germany, France, Japan and Britain, the United States and Taiwan of the continental law system to ensure the credibility of witness testimony, and summarizes the experience that can be used for reference. That is to say, in terms of the origin of the provisions to ensure the credibility of witness testimony, most of them are legal provisions; as far as the completeness of the provisions is concerned, the most important thing is that the whole procedure embodies the respect and importance of procedural justice. The investigation of witness guarantee in civil litigation in China is mainly carried out from the aspects of legislation and practice. On the one hand, the present legislative situation is mainly the combing of the judicial interpretation of the civil procedure law, which provides for the guarantee certificate of the witness in civil proceedings; on the other hand, it is divided into the scope of application, the format and the content of the witness guarantee certificate in practice. There are three small aspects to apply in the case. Through investigation, it is found that there are different degrees of recognition of witness bond in civil litigation in our country, and the stipulation of witness bond in civil action is too simple. The "extensive" application of the witness bond in civil proceedings is a matter of mere formality. The bond of witness in civil proceedings should be an effective means to ensure the credibility of witness's testimony, just like the oath or knot that belongs to the means of guaranteeing the credibility of witness's testimony, when it is combined with the judicial practice of specific country, Certain changes will take place in order to be more in line with judicial practice. Through the analysis of the problems existing in the witness bond in civil proceedings in our country, and after combining the experiences of the relevant countries and regions that can be used for reference, It is suggested that the perfect measures for witness guarantee in civil litigation in China are to attach importance to the guiding role of procedural justice, to specify the witness bond in the Civil procedure Law, and to refine the implementation of witness bond in civil proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】