「て」的本质及顺序逆接关系中「て」句法条件的考察

发布时间：2018-02-01 13:31

本文关键词： 接续助词「て」本质用法句法规则　出处：《西安外国语大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：「て」大概是日语中使用最多的接续助词。根据上下文的语义,可以对其用法做出若干分类。关于这方面,已存在着很多先行研究,但大部分都是以它起着中止作用构成中顿句为对象作出的分类。另外,目前为止理论上普遍认为中顿句中「て」的使用与否关联着文体,即口语体与文章体的对立。与此相反,对接续助词「て」的本质及其句法规则的考察论述却不够充分。因此,本文试扩大考察范围,不只限于中顿句,更进一步地对「て」的用法进行了分类,并从句法规则和语义制约出发,尝试弄清在何种情况下,接续助词「て」是不可欠缺的,并总结出其句法条件。因「て」用法涉及面广泛,故本文主要以「て」的时间继起和逆接用法为中心进行了总结。与此同时,亦总结了「て」在词汇层面的制约因素。在进行以上论述之前,本文首先论证了「て」的本质。本文认为「て」作为接续助词,其本身语义稀薄,而调整语气、单纯连接两个句子是其本质用法。至于先行研究中所主张的「て」表示各种语义关系的用法,都以上下文语义为前提,并非它本身具有积极表达此类语义的功能。对此,本文通过对比「て」与特定接续助词,考察两者在表达效果上的差异性,否定了它在语义关系表达方面的独立性。同时,将「て」与几个长期以来被广泛认可的语法范畴对应考察,排除了对其语法功能的混淆。
[Abstract]:According to the semantics of the context, it can be classified into a number of categories. There have been a lot of research on this aspect. However, most of them are classified by its suspensive function. In addition, it is generally thought that the use of "Li" in the sentence is related to the style or not. On the contrary, the study on the nature and syntactic rules of the contiguous auxiliary "Li" is not enough. Therefore, this paper tries to expand the scope of the study, not only in the middle of the sentence. Furthermore, it classifies the usage of "Li", and tries to find out under what circumstances it is necessary to follow the auxiliary word "Li" from the syntactic rules and semantic constraints. The syntactic conditions are summarized. Because the usage of "Li" involves a wide range of aspects, this paper mainly focuses on the time succession and reverse usage of "Li". At the same time, it summarizes. Before the above discussion, this paper first demonstrates the essence of "Li". This paper argues that "Li" as a supplementary word, its semantic thin, and adjust the tone of mood. It is essential to connect two sentences simply. As for the usage of "Hu", which is advocated in the previous research, the use of various semantic relations is based on the contextual semantics. It does not have the function of positive expression of this kind of semantics. In this paper, by comparing the "Li" with the specific auxiliary words, the author investigates the differences in the expression effect between the two. It negates its independence in the expression of semantic relations. At the same time, it makes a corresponding study of several grammatical categories which have been widely recognized for a long time, and eliminates the confusion of its grammatical functions.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H36

【相似文献】