俄汉语时间隐喻认知对比研究
发布时间：2018-10-16 19:43
【摘要】：隐喻无处不在,具有普遍性,无论在书面语还是口语中都随处可见。传统的隐喻理论认为隐喻是一种语言现象,是对话语进行修饰的修辞现象。当今的隐喻研究已经从单一的修辞学研究发展为跨学科、多角度的研究。莱考夫和约翰逊的著作《我们赖以生存的隐喻》(1980)标志着隐喻的研究从修辞和语义转向认知研究。当代认知语言学认为隐喻不仅是一种语言现象,而且是人类一种基本的认知方式。隐喻使我们能够利用已知的事物来理解未知的事物,用较具体的概念描述和表达较抽象的概念。人类在一定的时空当中活动,时间是一个抽象的概念,隐喻在时间表述的过程中起到不可取代的作用。“时间隐喻是指用隐喻的方式来表征时间,即将别的语义范畴里的概念、表达、关系映射于时间范畴中,从而获得对时间的理解和表征。”(陈燕、黄希庭,2006:604) 本文从认知的角度对隐喻进行研究,介绍国内外隐喻研究的历史和现状,运用概念隐喻理论对时间隐喻进行研究,并进行俄汉对比,探讨其异同及原因。 全文共分三章: 第一章:主要阐述中西隐喻研究的历史与现状。简要介绍西方隐喻的历史研究发展脉络及隐喻替代论、比较论。互动论以及隐喻认知研究等,归纳俄罗斯隐喻研究的情况、特点和未来发展趋势,并总结了中国隐喻研究的历史现状。 第二章:隐喻的认知研究。从认知语言学的角度对隐喻进行界定,对隐喻认知研究中遇到的诸多问题进行论证,如隐喻的认知本质、认知基础、认知功能、跨域映射、概念隐喻的分类、普遍性和系统性、不同的文化对俄汉语概念隐喻所产生的影响等。 第三章:对俄汉两种语言中时间的空间隐喻化认知、实体隐喻化认知和结构隐喻化认知这三种类型的隐喻方式在大量实例的基础上进行系统的对比研究,比较异同,并探究产生异同的原因。
[Abstract]:Metaphor is ubiquitous and universal, both in written and spoken English. The traditional metaphorical theory holds that metaphor is a linguistic phenomenon and a rhetorical phenomenon that modifies the utterance. Nowadays, metaphor research has developed from a single rhetorical study to a multi-disciplinary and multi-angle study. Lakoff and Johnson's book metaphor for our existence (1980) marks a shift from rhetoric and semantics to cognitive research. Contemporary cognitive linguistics holds that metaphor is not only a linguistic phenomenon, but also a basic cognitive way of human beings. Metaphor enables us to use what we know to understand the unknown and to describe and express more abstract concepts with more concrete concepts. Time is an abstract concept and metaphor plays an irreplaceable role in the process of time expression. "temporal metaphor is a metaphorical representation of time, in which concepts, expressions and relationships in other semantic categories are mapped to time categories, thus obtaining an understanding and representation of time." (Chen Yan, Huang Xiting, 2006: 604) this paper studies metaphor from a cognitive point of view, introduces the history and present situation of metaphor research at home and abroad, studies time metaphor with conceptual metaphor theory, and makes a comparison between Russian and Chinese. Discuss its similarities and differences and reason. The thesis is divided into three chapters: chapter one: the history and present situation of metaphor research in China and the West. This paper briefly introduces the historical development of western metaphor and the metaphorical substitution theory. Interaction theory and metaphorical cognition research, this paper sums up the situation, characteristics and future development trend of metaphor research in Russia, and summarizes the historical situation of metaphor study in China. Chapter two: the cognitive study of metaphor. This paper defines metaphor from the perspective of cognitive linguistics and demonstrates many problems encountered in the study of metaphorical cognition, such as the cognitive nature, cognitive basis, cognitive function, cross-domain mapping, classification, universality and systematicness of conceptual metaphor. The influence of different cultures on conceptual metaphors in Russian and Chinese. The third chapter makes a systematic comparative study of the three types of metaphorical cognition of time, substantive metaphorical cognition and structural metaphorical cognition in Russian and Chinese on the basis of a large number of examples, and compares the similarities and differences. And explore the causes of similarities and differences.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：H35;H15
本文编号：2275435
[Abstract]:Metaphor is ubiquitous and universal, both in written and spoken English. The traditional metaphorical theory holds that metaphor is a linguistic phenomenon and a rhetorical phenomenon that modifies the utterance. Nowadays, metaphor research has developed from a single rhetorical study to a multi-disciplinary and multi-angle study. Lakoff and Johnson's book metaphor for our existence (1980) marks a shift from rhetoric and semantics to cognitive research. Contemporary cognitive linguistics holds that metaphor is not only a linguistic phenomenon, but also a basic cognitive way of human beings. Metaphor enables us to use what we know to understand the unknown and to describe and express more abstract concepts with more concrete concepts. Time is an abstract concept and metaphor plays an irreplaceable role in the process of time expression. "temporal metaphor is a metaphorical representation of time, in which concepts, expressions and relationships in other semantic categories are mapped to time categories, thus obtaining an understanding and representation of time." (Chen Yan, Huang Xiting, 2006: 604) this paper studies metaphor from a cognitive point of view, introduces the history and present situation of metaphor research at home and abroad, studies time metaphor with conceptual metaphor theory, and makes a comparison between Russian and Chinese. Discuss its similarities and differences and reason. The thesis is divided into three chapters: chapter one: the history and present situation of metaphor research in China and the West. This paper briefly introduces the historical development of western metaphor and the metaphorical substitution theory. Interaction theory and metaphorical cognition research, this paper sums up the situation, characteristics and future development trend of metaphor research in Russia, and summarizes the historical situation of metaphor study in China. Chapter two: the cognitive study of metaphor. This paper defines metaphor from the perspective of cognitive linguistics and demonstrates many problems encountered in the study of metaphorical cognition, such as the cognitive nature, cognitive basis, cognitive function, cross-domain mapping, classification, universality and systematicness of conceptual metaphor. The influence of different cultures on conceptual metaphors in Russian and Chinese. The third chapter makes a systematic comparative study of the three types of metaphorical cognition of time, substantive metaphorical cognition and structural metaphorical cognition in Russian and Chinese on the basis of a large number of examples, and compares the similarities and differences. And explore the causes of similarities and differences.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：H35;H15
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 潘震;;论“空间-时间”隐喻的多重性[J];甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
2 李宇明;空间在世界认知中的地位——语言与认知关系的考察[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年03期
3 王淑杰;;俄汉民族时间隐喻认知结构模式研究[J];牡丹江教育学院学报;2009年03期
4 徐英平;;俄汉语“前、后”在时间域的表征错合[J];外语研究;2008年02期
5 周榕;隐喻的语义表征模型初探[J];外语学刊;2003年02期
6 郭熙煌;范畴化理论与时间概念的共性现象[J];四川外语学院学报;2004年06期
7 叶卫华;;“前”字所反映的汉民族的时间认知[J];宿州学院学报;2007年06期
8 王永红;从汉英时间隐喻之异同看隐喻与文化的关系[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2001年02期
9 周榕!400715重庆北碚;隐喻认知基础的心理现实性——时间的空间隐喻表征的实验证据[J];外语教学与研究;2001年02期
10 周榕;时间隐喻表征的跨文化研究[J];现代外语;2000年01期
，本文编号：2275435
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/eyulunwen/2275435.html
