当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 汉语言论文 >

从意象图式视角探析语篇连贯

发布时间:2018-06-25 14:18

  本文选题:语篇 + 连贯 ; 参考:《鲁东大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:作为复杂的语言现象,连贯一直以来是语言学家关注的焦点。它最早来源于修辞学,是使文章获得统一性的重要前提,如今连贯己成为语篇分析的重要研究对象。连贯是一个复杂的语言现象,涉及语义、语用以及认知等各方面,随着人们对语篇认识的深化以及认知语言学的迅速崛起,近年来从认知角度来解读语篇连贯越来越受到重视。 就研究角度而言,学者大多热衷于从语篇本身或者通过隐喻研究语篇连贯,本文选取的研究视角是意象图式。概观以往意象图式与语篇连贯的研究,基本从两个方面分析:一方面,意象图式基于不同的感觉和运动经验,表现为一种简单、直观的方式,本身具有可以直接理解的概念结构。我们发现此种分析方法对意象图式的复杂性及在其它因素的介入上认识不够,选取的意象图式过于静态、单一,因此缺乏研究深度。另一方面,意象图式通过隐喻,实现从现实物理感知映射到抽象领域。这种分析方法多关注意象图式与隐喻的互动,忽视了意象图式与ICM其它模式的互动,并以此形成复杂概念来实现语篇整体性。 针对以上分析方法的缺陷,本文在以下方面做出补充与拓展。同一语篇中意象图式并非以单一的方式存在,它常涉及多个意象图式叠加互动,并以此形成复合意象图式,加之文化、情境等因素的参与形成更为复杂的意象图式,这些都会影响语篇连贯性。我们把这些图式称为拓展意象图式,其中包括复合意象图式文化意象图式和情境意象图式,并分别探讨它们在语篇连贯中的作用。意象图式作为ICM中最基本模型,它基于感知经验,是人们从时空中得到并把它应用于构建其它更为复杂抽象的经验,与以往研究语篇连贯时多注重探讨意象图式与隐喻互动不同的是,,本文将全面系统探究意象图式与ICM中各个模型的互动与运作,通过构建命题模型、操作隐喻模型、激活转喻模型来实现语篇连贯。 本文试图提出一个相对完整的意象图式理论框架用以阐释语篇的连贯问题,为认知语言学与功能语言学的互补性研究提供了一个值得参考的切入点。目的在于对意象图式本身进行理论推演,深化我们对语篇连贯的本质以及其运作机制的认识。
[Abstract]:As a complex linguistic phenomenon, coherence has always been the focus of linguists. It originates from rhetoric and is an important prerequisite for the unity of discourse. Nowadays coherence has become an important research object in discourse analysis. Coherence is a complex linguistic phenomenon involving semantic pragmatic and cognitive aspects. With the deepening of understanding of discourse and the rapid rise of cognitive linguistics more and more attention has been paid to interpreting text coherence from a cognitive perspective in recent years. In terms of research, most scholars are keen to study text coherence from the perspective of text itself or through metaphor. The research perspective chosen in this paper is image schema. An overview of previous studies on image schema and discourse coherence is based on two aspects: on the one hand, image schemata are based on different feelings and motion experiences, and are expressed in a simple and intuitive way. Itself has a conceptual structure that can be directly understood. We find that the complexity of image schema and the involvement of other factors are not well understood by this analysis method, and the selected image schema is too static and single, so it lacks the depth of research. On the other hand, image schema maps from physical perception to abstract field through metaphor. This method pays more attention to the interaction between image schema and metaphor, neglects the interaction between image schema and ICM other models, and forms complex concepts to realize text integrity. In view of the defects of the above analysis methods, this paper supplements and expands on the following aspects. The image schema in the same text does not exist in a single way. It often involves the superposition and interaction of multiple image schemas, and forms a complex image schema with the participation of the factors such as culture, situation and so on. All this will affect the coherence of the text. We refer to these schemas as extended image schemas, including complex image schemas. Cultural image schema and situational image schema are discussed respectively. As the most basic model in ICM, image schema is based on perceptual experience, which is derived from time and space and applied to construct other more complex and abstract experiences. Different from the previous researches on discourse coherence, this paper will explore the interaction and operation of image schema and each model in ICM, and construct a propositional model to operate the metaphorical model. The metonymy model is activated to achieve textual coherence. This paper attempts to present a relatively complete framework of image schema theory to explain the coherence of discourse, which provides a useful starting point for the study of the complementarity between cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. The purpose is to deduce the image schema itself and deepen our understanding of the nature of discourse coherence and its operational mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:鲁东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H052

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 熊学亮;语言的ICM和语言研究的ICM[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2003年03期

2 张德禄;语篇连贯与语篇的信息结构——论语篇连贯的条件[J];外语研究;1992年03期

3 王寅;;认知语言学与语篇连贯研究——八论语言的体验性:语篇连贯的认知基础[J];外语研究;2006年06期

4 王寅;语篇连贯的认知世界分析方法——体验哲学和认知语言学对语篇连贯性的解释[J];外语学刊;2005年04期

5 苗兴伟;;语篇分析的进展与前沿[J];外语学刊;2006年01期

6 李福印;;意象图式理论[J];四川外语学院学报;2007年01期

7 卢卫中;路云;;语篇衔接与连贯的认知机制[J];外语教学;2006年01期

8 张德禄;语篇连贯与语篇的非结构性组织形式——论语篇连贯的条件[J];外国语(上海外国语学院学报);1993年03期

9 李佳;蔡金亭;;认知语言学角度的英语空间介词习得研究[J];现代外语;2008年02期

10 朱永生;试论语篇连贯的内部条件(下)[J];现代外语;1997年01期



本文编号:2066290

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2066290.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1bfc5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com