作意幻设——蒋骥《山带阁注楚辞》对屈辞“艺术性”的认识

发布时间：2018-01-07 02:04

本文关键词：作意幻设——蒋骥《山带阁注楚辞》对屈辞“艺术性”的认识　出处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《楚辞》研究史中,汉代以至宋代,人们大体从屈原之人格与情志角度更多讨论的是屈原其"人"而非其"文"。这一诠释典范至宋代朱熹始变,及晚明清初而转型,借由考究屈辞作品本身语言形式之艺术性以诠评其美感及价值。这个走向所呈现之理论视野、审美意识与批评方法,均甚为可观。《离骚》篇中两次超写实的幻想天界巡游便已明白启示想象是诗的灵魂。两次虚构的神界飞行,直接打通事实(factual)与虚构的(fictional)畦界,同化为一,这自然不是以任何写实的叙写模式所能兼容索解。对此,蒋骥《山带阁注楚辞》能在崇实斥虚的文学思想外,正视屈辞的"虚构"性质与意义,是对屈辞"艺术性"认识的拓深。
[Abstract]:< > in the research history of Chu, Han Dynasty and Song Dynasty, people generally from Qu Yuan personality and emotional perspective is more discussed the Qu Yuan "people" rather than the "text". This interpretation of the Song Dynasty Buddhist sutra fan Zhu Xi was changed, and the late Ming Dynasty and early Qing Dynasty and the transformation, by the exquisite art of Qu CI itself language form to interpret its beauty and value. This shows the trend of theoretical vision, aesthetic consciousness and criticism, are very impressive. Fantasy parade two celestial ultra realistic text already understand Lisao > enlightenment imagination is the soul of poetry. The two fictional world flight, directly through the fact (factual) and Fiction (fictional) as a border, which of course is not assimilation, in any realistic narration mode is compatible solution. In this regard, Jiang Ji Chu Ge < note > belt in the exclusion of the literary thoughts of virtual Soongsil, face Quci "fiction" nature and significance of Quci "art". The depth of knowledge is deep.

【作者单位】：台湾政治大学中国文学系;
【分类号】：I207.22
【正文快照】： 一本文所谓“艺术性”,即指作品中语言构成的艺术表现与审美特征,类似俄国形式主义所谓的“文学性”(literariness),指文学之为文学的根本规定性(1),是文学与人文其他学科之间划定疆界的内在依据,是与“文学的本质”“文学的存在”有某种类似之处的同类概念。也就是说,关于“

【相似文献】