“重写文学史”运动的实践与反思

发布时间：2018-01-29 20:25

本文关键词： 重写文学史运动实践反思　出处：《西安外国语大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：20世纪80年代,“重写文学史”曾一度成为学术界的一大热点,面对旧有文学史的不足与局限,学者们通过各种视角与方法对文学史质的“重写”做了艰难努力。然如今,距“重写文学史”运动结束也已有数十年之久,但每每提到重写文学史,人们还是反射性地想到1988年的“重写文学史”运动,因此无论是对于“重写文学史”的整体理解,还是基于现在文学史写作的考量,都有必要对特定意义的“重写文学史”进行回顾与梳理,这不仅有利于我们了解当时“重写文学史”是怎样举步维艰地发展到今天我们所看到的被认为是佳作的文学史,且更为重要的是通过这种梳理与分析,从中吸取经验,亦能够更好地指导我们新世纪中国现当代文学史的写作,因为虽然“重写文学史”已然终结,但文学史的写作/重写却远未终结。论文以“重写文学史”运动为切入点,将全文分为四章:第一章主要对“重写文学史”运动之前的“重写”行为进行概述。其中包括70年代末80年代初的“重评”及大陆文学史写作;80年代初海外文学研究成果对大陆“重写文学史”的影响以及80年代中期,文学史整体观念的提出。之所以将此三者以时间顺序进行梳理,一方面是想证明尽管当时并未明确提出“重写文学史”这个名称,但“重写”的意识与行为却在实际的文学研究中屡屡体现;另一方面,通过这一步步“重写”行为的梳理,既可以引出并说明80年代末“重写文学史”运动之所以会发生是一种历史的必然,且“重写”行为与“重写文学史”运动的相互联系又正好共同构成了80年代所谓的“重写文学史”思潮。第二、三章为全文的核心,即主要对“重写文学史”运动本身进行了详细论述。如发生的背景(政治与学术角度、地理文化角度);过程中所讨论的焦点问题(“重写”之争、“标准”之争等)及意义(局限与理论功绩)。最后一章,则是对“重写文学史”运动所带来的实践成果进行举例与(比较)分析。因为无论“重写文学史”运动有着怎样的局限或者理论功绩,最能够体现其价值的则必定是“新”文学史著作的问世,而这种“新”,已不再只是一次次地“复写”,相反,更多体现的则是一种质的转变,一种文学史观的不断突破。
[Abstract]:In 1980s, "rewriting the history of literature" once became a hot spot in academic circles, faced with the shortcomings and limitations of the old literary history. Scholars have tried hard to rewrite the quality of literary history through various perspectives and methods. However, it has been decades since the end of the "rewriting literary history" movement, but it is often mentioned that rewriting literary history. People reflexively think of the "rewriting literary history" movement in 1988, so whether it is the overall understanding of "rewriting literary history" or based on the consideration of the present literary history writing. It is necessary to review and comb the "rewriting the history of literature" in a specific sense. This is not only helpful for us to understand how "rewriting the history of literature" developed to what we see today is considered to be a good literary history, and more importantly, through this sort of combing and analysis. Learning from the experience can also better guide our writing of Chinese modern and contemporary literary history in the new century, because "rewriting the literary history" has already come to an end. However, the writing / rewriting of literary history is far from over. The thesis is divided into four chapters: the first chapter summarizes the "rewriting" behavior before the "rewriting of literary history" movement, including the "reevaluation" from the end of 70s to the beginning of 80s and the writing of the history of mainland literature; In 80s, the influence of overseas literature research results on the mainland's "rewriting literary history" and the middle of 80s, the overall concept of literary history was put forward. The three were sorted out in chronological order. On the one hand, it is to prove that although the name of "rewriting the history of literature" was not explicitly put forward at that time, the consciousness and behavior of "rewriting" were frequently reflected in the actual literary studies. On the other hand, through this step by step "rewriting" behavior combing, can lead to and explain in the end of 80s, "rewrite the history of literature" movement will occur is a historical necessity. Moreover, the relationship between rewriting behavior and rewriting literary history movement formed the thought of "rewriting literary history" in 80s. The second, third chapter is the core of the thesis. That is to say, the movement of rewriting the history of literature is discussed in detail, such as the background (political and academic, geographical and cultural); The focus of the discussion in the process ("rewriting", "standard", etc.) and its significance (limitations and theoretical achievements, etc.). The last chapter. It is an example and a comparative analysis of the practical achievements brought about by the rewriting of literary history, because no matter what limitations or theoretical achievements the rewriting of literary history has. What can most embody its value is the coming out of "new" literary history works, and this kind of "new" is no longer just "rewriting" again and again, on the contrary, it is more of a change of germplasm. A breakthrough in the view of literary history.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I206.7

【参考文献】