《历代辞赋总汇》编纂指瑕

发布时间：2018-03-07 05:20

  本文选题：《历代辞赋总汇》　切入点：马积高　出处：《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：马积高先生主编的《历代辞赋总汇》是中国辞赋集大成者,它的出版在辞赋乃至整个文史研究领域厥功甚伟。然而,由于卷帙浩繁,且成于众人之手,该书编纂出现了一些疏漏和失误,其主要表现有五个方面:同一作者误作两人分立、同一作品误作两篇分立、部分作品版本互校不力、正录与外录的文体标准不一、方志文献利用存有地域局限。对于入选作品的文体甄别,作为全书主编的马积高先生原本是有清晰的分辨意识的,并提出了明确的收录标准,但是,后来在实际编纂过程中这些意识和标准并未得到统一执行,以致出现了一定程度的纷乱。编纂阙误在清代卷中较为集中,其中从《赋海大观》所移入的四百余万字篇幅存在的问题尤为突出,可能是整个编纂工作的“重灾区”。
[Abstract]:Mr. Ma Jigao's "General Collection of ci Fu", edited by Mr. Ma Jigao, is a masterpiece of Chinese ci Fu, whose publication has great merit in the field of ci Fu and even the whole field of literary and historical research. However, because of its voluminous size and being in the hands of many people, There are some omissions and mistakes in the compilation of the book, which are mainly manifested in five aspects: the mistake of the same author for the separation of two people, the mistake of the same work for two separate articles, the weak revision of some works, and the different stylistic standards between the correct and external records. There are regional limitations in the use of local records. As for the stylistic discrimination of selected works, Mr. Ma Jigao, the editor of the book, originally had a clear sense of discrimination and put forward clear criteria for inclusion, but, Later in the actual compilation process, these consciousness and standards were not uniformly implemented, resulting in a certain degree of confusion. Among them, the problem of more than 400 words transferred from "Fu Hai Da Guan" is particularly prominent, which may be the "disaster area" of the whole compilation work.
【作者单位】： 广东第二师范学院中文系;
【分类号】：I207.22
，

本文编号：1578102