古典诗辞中的特长句式研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 12:23

本文选题：古典文学　切入点：体裁　出处：《青海民族大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：自公元12世纪,由《诗镜》传入西藏以来,历代藏族学者对此进行翻译和注释,并以此作为主要理论模式,形成了浩如烟海之文学作品,使藏族文学从传统的创作方式引领至新的发展道路。其中,“特长句式”是藏族古代文学中常见的一种别具一格的诗体,亦是藏族原有的创作方式之一。萨迦班智达在其作《智者入门》中对“特长句式”作过注解,并后世学者对把这一创作方式将归为何种诗体提出了不同看法,且“特长句式”的理论和实践失去平衡,导致“特长句式”这种文体在之后的发展过程中,相较于其它在理论和实践两方面都比较滞后。为此,笔者以特长句式作为主要研究对象,对诸多“特长句式”作品进行对比和分析,来总结“特长句式”的特点和归类。本文除前言和总结、附录,后记部分之外,共由四大章节组成:第—章讲述了 “特长句式”之历史原由,即在韵律学和诗学理论中的提及和不同说法,以及最初在古印度文坛中“特长句式”分为“韵文诗”与“非韵文诗”的创作模式至公元12世纪传入西藏的历史源流。第二章主要分析了“特长句式”之诗体归类,列出了历代学者对此的不同看法,提出了“特长句式”的概念和分类等。第三章讲述了 “特长句式”之独特的韵律排序和修辞特点,并且提出了 “特长句式”是表达特殊意义和赞美时运用的创作方式。第四章主要通过历代学者对“特长句式”之不同概念进行解读,并结合于藏族文学的发展历程,分析总结了 “特长句式”在藏族文学中未能传承发展的内外因素。总之,笔者认为“特长句式”应分为“韵文诗”和“非韵文诗”,相关例句也能——列举。因此,可以说“特长句式”在藏族文学中是一种古老的文体,因为《诗镜》和《韵律宝源论》中提出了此文体;也可以说是一种新的文体。因为在此后的藏族文学理论发展中,“特长句式”的理论没能形成于藏族语言表达方式相统一的,别具一格的理论体系。
[Abstract]:Since 12th century, when the poem Mirror was introduced into Tibet, Tibetan scholars in successive dynasties have translated and annotated it, and used it as the main theoretical model to form a vast number of literary works. To lead Tibetan literature from the traditional way to a new way of development. Among them, "special sentence pattern" is a unique style of poetry common in ancient Tibetan literature. It is also one of the original Tibetan creative methods. In his introduction to the Wise, Sakya Banzhida annotated the "very strong sentence structure", and later scholars put forward different views on what kind of poetry will be classified into this way of writing. Moreover, the theory and practice of "super long sentence pattern" are out of balance, which leads to the lags behind in the later development process of "extra long sentence pattern", compared with other aspects in theory and practice. In this paper, the author makes a comparison and analysis of many "super-long sentence patterns" in order to summarize the characteristics and classification of "extra long sentence patterns", except the foreword and summary, appendix, and postscript, in addition to the foreword and summary, appendix, and postscript, in addition to the foreword and summary, the appendix and the postscript. It is composed of four chapters: chapter-describes the historical reasons of "extraordinary sentence pattern", that is, the mention and different statements in prosody and poetics theory. And the historical origin of "super long sentence pattern" in ancient Indian literary world, which is divided into "rhyme poem" and "non-rhyme poem" from 12th century AD. The second chapter mainly analyzes the classification of the poetic style of "super long sentence pattern". This paper lists the different opinions of the scholars of the past dynasties, and puts forward the concept and classification of the "super-long sentence pattern". Chapter three deals with the unique rhythmic arrangement and rhetorical characteristics of the "extra-long sentence pattern". It also puts forward that "super long sentence pattern" is a creative way to express special meaning and praise. Chapter 4th mainly interprets the different concepts of "super long sentence pattern" by scholars of past dynasties, and combines it with the development of Tibetan literature. This paper analyzes and summarizes the internal and external factors of the failure of inheritance and development of "super long sentence pattern" in Tibetan literature. In short, the author thinks that "super long sentence pattern" should be divided into "verse poem" and "non-rhyme poem", and relevant example sentences can also be listed. It can be said that "very strong sentence pattern" is an ancient style in Tibetan literature, because it is put forward in Poems Mirror and prosody Baoyuan. It can also be said that it is a new style, because in the later development of Tibetan literature theory, the theory of "special sentence structure" could not be formed in the unified and unique theoretical system of Tibetan language expression.
【学位授予单位】：青海民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.22

【相似文献】