在“求是”与“致用”之间——20世纪早期中国文学批评史书写路径检视

发布时间：2018-03-31 03:34

本文选题：求是　切入点：致用　出处：《中国高校社会科学》2017年05期

【摘要】：在西方科学主义观念的主导下,"五四"时期形成激进的反传统和重估传统价值的思潮,间接促使了中国文学批评史的勃兴。"求是"与"致用"是传统与现代之矛盾的派生物,贯穿了20世纪早期中国文学批评史的书写,并在其书写路径、运思模式和理论品格上造成大量的问题。其争论点在于,贯彻历史主义的"求是"原则,就必然要求在文学观上采取多元、多样化的立场;主张科学主义的"致用"原则,又会偏离文学批评史的客观性。陈钟凡提出"历史的批评",郭绍虞主张"批评史路径",罗根泽倡导"原理路径",他们都侧重于历史主义的"求是"原则;胡适的整理国故,在方法论上似乎中西兼顾融通,而在世界观、文化观上更倾向于"致用"原则和全盘西化。中国文学批评史学科正是在"求是"与"致用"之间创立起来的。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of western scientism, radical anti-tradition and revaluation of traditional values were formed during the May 4th Movement, which indirectly promoted the prosperity of the history of Chinese literary criticism. Throughout the early 20th century, the history of Chinese literary criticism was written, and caused a lot of problems in its writing path, mode of thinking and theoretical character. The issue lies in carrying out the "seeking truth" principle of historicism. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a pluralistic and diversified stand on the view of literature, and to advocate the principle of scientism "making use of". They will deviate from the objectivity of the history of literary criticism. Chen Zhongfan put forward "historical criticism", Guo Shaoyu advocated "the path of criticism history" and Luo Genze advocated "principle path". They all focused on the "seeking truth" principle of historicism, and Hu Shi's collation of national heritage. In methodology, it seems that both China and the West combine together, while the world outlook and cultural view are more inclined to the principle of "making use of" and the overall westernization. The subject of Chinese literary criticism history was founded between "seeking truth" and "making use of".
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院外国文学研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院创新工程重大项目“《中华思想通史》文艺思想编”阶段性成果
【分类号】：I206.09

【相似文献】